IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New How do we know who people voted for?
All the stories are about how the polls were so far off. White men were down for Trump, everyone else was up. But how do we know that?

Ballots don't have demographic info. How do we know how people actually voted, and why do we trust that method more than we trust pre-election polling?
--

Drew
New Because its all we've got?
bcnu,
Mikem

It's mourning in America again.
New demographics and the vote tallies?
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
New Nope, how would you know men were down and women were up in a district?
--

Drew
New The one advantage of exit polls
You get to talk to actual voters. Short of a significant fraction telling porkies, statistical methods can adjust for the lopsided turnout.
New True, it definitely selects out the ones who don't actually vote (but have opinions)
--

Drew
New I assume it's census tract data mostly.
E.g. if a census tract is 90% Green and the votes are 90% for Mango, then its a reasonable extrapolation that Greens voted for Mango.

Voting information is public information. One can't tell who one voted for, but one can see that 98.382% of a district/census tract/zip code voted. Coupled with other data, one can make pretty good inferences.

Now, statements like "Moral issues were #1 with Green voters" is a bunch of nonsense, especially in Plague Times.

Cheers,
Scott.
     How do we know who people voted for? - (drook) - (6)
         Because its all we've got? -NT - (mmoffitt)
         demographics and the vote tallies? -NT - (boxley) - (3)
             Nope, how would you know men were down and women were up in a district? -NT - (drook) - (2)
                 The one advantage of exit polls - (scoenye) - (1)
                     True, it definitely selects out the ones who don't actually vote (but have opinions) -NT - (drook)
         I assume it's census tract data mostly. - (Another Scott)

*sniff*
51 ms