Don't we have an Attorney General and Justice Department for things like that?

Post #433,510 by Another Scott 4/9/20 8:32:48 PM 4/9/20 8:32:48 PM Reply	Don't we have an Attorney General and Justice Department for things like that? Do you want the President telling the AG who to prosecute? Are you a big fan of Donnie's lackey Bill Barr? https://twitter.com/nycsouthpaw/status/1248273801567186946 To be clear: Congress can investigate. The FBI can investigate. The DOJ can prosecute. It's not the President's job to be telling them who to go after. The AG is the AG of the United States, not the AG of the President. Cheers, Scott.
Post #433,512 by Ashton 4/9/20 9:40:01 PM 4/9/20 9:40:01 PM Reply	[You imagine that this cabal Cares about 'Procedures', at all?] We'll See™. Of Course! everyone not-asleep: anticipates THE REVIEW /many with relish, add moi.. IF ..there's an election. At all. IF it is not manifestly an obvious-Creature of the GOP voter-suppression as. is. most. Likely. I wot. ie ((sheesh!}} were the dis-US even remotely "in a democratic sorta-'state'"; aka: Functioning: 90% of the palaver across all States ... would be superfluous: would be about Sports Scores. IT'S APRIL and the WH-PURGES are incrementally-rising. Should that become ~ e^{x dx dx} ... Tell Us All about %WHAT? of any DC-Branch of Govt--shall function at all? I'm. All. Ears. (and you're nearest the accretion disk of the DC Black Hole).
Post #433,518 by Another Scott 4/9/20 11:52:51 PM 4/9/20 11:52:51 PM Reply	I have no doubt that Donnie is going to continue to break things. But we are going to have an election in November, and a new President in January. Preemptively talking about how horrible Biden is when we have a monster in the White House killing people strikes me as really, really stupid. Especially since we saw that same script in 2015-2016... YMMV. :-) Cheers, Scott.
Post #433,514 by boxley 4/9/20 9:57:49 PM 4/9/20 9:57:49 PM Reply	well, will the new one stand on the tarmac and take orders from the ex-president? "Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
Post #433,517 by Another Scott 4/9/20 11:49:45 PM 4/9/20 11:49:45 PM Reply	Yeah, just like they made a fortune on White Water. https://qz.com/1306227/in-the-inspector-generals-report-bill-clinton-and-loretta-lynch-describe-their-tarmac-meeting/ Bill likes to talk. Film at 11. She didn't take any "orders" from him. And no AG would take their "orders" from an ex-president. Don't be daft. Cheers, Scott.
Post #433,520 by boxley 4/10/20 9:54:32 AM 4/10/20 9:54:32 AM Reply	was pocket change unlike what they took in from the russian ogliarches "Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
Post #433,523 by Ashton 4/10/20 2:33:46 PM 4/10/20 2:33:46 PM Reply	..[oblig] "What? that was nothing! compared-with the coverup of all those orphans (some with spina-biffida) they used for target practice" (stress relief) in the basement of an unlisted-address in the Poconos. (You just don't know how to Un- Earth- the REALLY-juicy stuff, which only the Illuminati Know-and-you-Don't) Make-believe is like the Universe: infinite-in-this-case and Unbounded. It's.. In--Credible !!! See: you didn't even know--as do we Insiders--how/where (they put that little dose-dispenser in your water line.) But: clearly it's been Working, all along. (It's portable: moves with You). That is all, Carrion.
Post #433,564 by crazy 4/13/20 7:00:45 AM 4/13/20 7:00:45 AM Reply	A few days ago you could put together a cogent thought Essentially after I beat the distractions and trolling away. At the end you agreed with me. Yet here you are back to being a trolling SOB. Sigh. Ok CC, he's all yours.
Post #434,946 by CRConrad 6/30/20 5:29:05 PM 6/30/20 5:29:05 PM Reply	Oh look, another long-debunked right-wing talking point. Surprise, surprise. I've wondered for a good long while, so please explain: Are you somehow able to keep posting these obvious lies year in, year out without feeling any sorrow at all for your long-lost intellectual integrity -- or is it that you see some higher glorious purpose for them, that makes it worth the sacrifice? -- Christian R. Conrad The Man Who (used to think he) Knows Fucking Everything Mail: Same username as at the top left of this post, at iki.fi
Post #433,519 by mmoffitt 4/10/20 8:28:05 AM 4/10/20 8:28:05 AM Reply	You mean like Holder? Mr. Holder had already ruled out any charges related to the use of waterboarding and other methods that most human rights experts consider to be torture. His announcement closes a contentious three-year investigation by the Justice Department and brings to an end years of dispute over whether line intelligence or military personnel or their superiors would be held accountable for the abuse of prisoners in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. The closing of the two cases means that the Obama administration’s limited effort to scrutinize the counterterrorism programs carried out under President George W. Bush has come to an end. Without elaborating, Mr. Holder suggested that the end of the criminal investigation should not be seen as a moral exoneration of those involved in the prisoners’ treatment and deaths. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/31/us/holder-rules-out-prosecutions-in-cia-interrogations.html?_r=1&pagewanted=1 Maybe taking a cue from Obama? Q Spanish judge Baltasar Garzón is considering a lawsuit filed by attorneys representing six Spaniards who were at one point held at Guantanamo. And that lawsuit wants to go after President Bush's legal team. What is your reaction to that? THE PRESIDENT: Well, you know, obviously I've been very clear that Guantanamo is to be closed, that some of the practices of enhanced interrogation techniques I think ran counter to American values and American traditions. So I've put an end to these policies. I'm a strong believer that it's important to look forward and not backwards, and to remind ourselves that we do have very real security threats out there. http://voices.washingtonpost.com/white-house-watch/obama-interview-with-cnn-en-es.html Anybody get prosecuted? Nope. Okay. Well, there was this one case ... The details in the Senate report on Central Intelligence Agency torture, released today, are shocking. But don't expect anyone to be held responsible. The only person the Obama administration has prosecuted in connection with the torture program is a man who revealed its existence to the media. https://www.vox.com/xpress/2014/12/9/7361667/senate-torture-report-kiriakou There is no sane reason to believe anyone in the Trump Administration will be prosecuted for anything under a Biden Administration. Real Democrats (the DNC, Bankster class approved types) know that digging into the malfeasance of Republicans might lend credibility to investigating things like, say, the Democratic President who started locking kids in cages at the border or the Democratic President who ordered more assassinations by drone than any other, including a US citizen, without trial or oversight. And we simply can't have that. bcnu, Mikem It's mourning in America again.
Post #433,522 by Ashton 4/10/20 2:13:05 PM 4/10/20 2:13:05 PM Reply	But.. but... Are you suggesting that: the dis-US %overall-Corruption is no longer measured in milli-Bolsonaros [an an hoc Test® just created] ..but more like KIll-O-Bolsonaros? The Word for today (as explains much, when one thinks about it-all?) ... inured. T'aint Easy dwelling amidst the perhaps least-informed feckless tribes ever assembled on one Continent (well, not for this moi, anyway) Yours in sloth.. it's within the atmospheric globules now, its Half-life measured in DJT-days-in-office Units (according to NIST).

Welcome to IWETHEY!