IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New They are both rather elongated fish . . .
. . and they live in similar environments. It would be natural for people familiar with the Atlantic Ling to make the association when they encountered the Pacific fish, which is a bit stubbier, thus the added "cod" part.
New Yup: The Pacific one, "elongatus"... While ling -- m. molva -- is "Långa" in Swedish. As in "Longa".
     Surstromming - Yes, I did it - I had to do it. - (Andrew Grygus) - (15)
         Jeez, and I thought lutefisk was different. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - (2)
             I haven't done lutefisk yet - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
                 That's not a recipe - (drook)
         wonder how different it is from stinkheads, fermented alaska salmon heads -NT - (boxley)
         That stuff is banned from passenger jet cabins on 4 airlines - (malraux)
         Lutfisk, properly watered-out, is pretty much nothing compared to surströmming. - (CRConrad) - (9)
             Thanks for your input. - (Andrew Grygus)
             now that is interesting, In alaska we have a fish called ling cod as distinct from cod - (boxley) - (7)
                 No - (Andrew Grygus) - (6)
                     Could still be as the BOx says, that *the name* is related? - (CRConrad) - (2)
                         They are both rather elongated fish . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
                             Yup: The Pacific one, "elongatus"... While ling -- m. molva -- is "Långa" in Swedish. As in "Longa". -NT - (CRConrad)
                     thanks for the knowledge -NT - (boxley) - (2)
                         Oh sure, *that* you believe -NT - (drook) - (1)
                             it is sourced properly -NT - (boxley)

The simplest explanation is that I'm an idiot!
80 ms