IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New No, Wordstar was never adequate.
It was a single buffer word processor, one document at a time. I could NEVER live with that. There were 8-bit DOS multi-buffer word processors based on emacs in those days, and that's what I used. Freely cut and paste from one document to another.

An added feature, not obvious at the time, is that they were "markup language" processors - no attempt at wysiwyg. Since I learned to visualize pages as I wrote them, embedding the markup as I wrote, writing in html just came naturally. I have never used a wysiwyg html tool, and I can't stand them. They're clumsy, and write junky code.
New Still prefer WordPerfect to Word thanks to "view codes"
--

Drew
     Nostalgic LRPD sez: "Somewhere out there, a Big Cheetah is still running WordStar and - (Ashton) - (4)
         No, Wordstar was never adequate. - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
             Still prefer WordPerfect to Word thanks to "view codes" -NT - (drook)
         I still miss JerryP. - (CRConrad) - (1)
             Agreed - (crazy)

Full ahead flank!
33 ms