IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New She's so unpopular that she got millions of votes more than he did...
New Think of how many the candidate would have gotten without the deep negatives
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
New She's so horribly unpopular but she got more votes. Hmmm...
If someone was better, they should have stepped up and beat her in nomination contest. Maybe the fact that no Democrat could beat her says something about her actual popularity (as opposed to what WND and places like that want you to believe).

Bernie couldn't beat her (and wasn't (and isn't) a Democrat). MOM couldn't beat her.

Who was supposed to beat her in this alternative universe? Why didn't they run and do it?

Cheers,
Scott.
New “Who was supposed to beat her in this alternative universe?”
Over at the “Lawyers, Guns & Money” blog there’s a running joke to the effect that all the Democrats need to do to prevail in 2020 is to nominate Johnny Unbeatable. Simple, no? Wonder why they didn’t think of that earlier…

cordially,
New Iknowright!!
New 2020 how about someone not affiliated with Clinton cartel?
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
New Name someone that you think would win. Quit blaming the Clintons.
New He's right to blame the Clintons.
They destroyed the Democratic Party.

Remember this?
As recounted by Bob Woodward in The Agenda: Inside the Clinton White House, Clinton vented to his advisers: "'Where are all the Democrats?' Clinton bellowed. 'I hope you're all aware we're all Eisenhower Republicans,' he said, his voice dripping with sarcasm. 'We're all Eisenhower Republicans here, and we are fighting the Reagan Republicans. We stand for lower deficits and free trade and the bond market. Isn't that great?'"

http://www.newsweek.com/spending-freeze-obama-eisenhower-republican-71153

Yeah. It was fscking "great" all right. Great for Republicans everywhere. Not so great for Democrats, but they don't really count anyway because "where else are they going to go?" Right? Well they answered in 2016 and we all know how ugly that was. Fear not, though, because the same toadies in charge of the DNC are there still and will guarantee YAN Eisenhower Republican is the Democratic nominee. But, that too, is all right isn't it? Because PARTY!
bcnu,
Mikem

It's mourning in America again.
New Blah, blah, blah.
Woodward is a hack.

(Yes, I'm shooting the messenger.)

Clinton left office 18+ years ago.

The choice was between a mostly-sane party and an insane party, helped by the Russians, helped by a political hack at the FBI, helped by a press corps that was more interested in chasing clicks and eyeballs than informing the public, helped by people who insisted on believing the absolute worst lies about a decent person, helped by people who insisted on letting visions of some workers' led glorious revolution color their view of reality.

Hillary got millions more votes than her opponents. She wasn't the problem.

When's Bernie going to release his tax returns? Hmm? What does he have to hide anyway? Got any thoughts about that? ;-p

But we've been through all this before.

Do you have your "Charlotte Never!!" bumper sticker yet? Don't want to be the last one on the bandwagon - she's only got 32 years to go... :-/

Cheers,
Scott.
New He left 18 years ago, but his influence obviously didn't. What's "Charlotte Never" about?
bcnu,
Mikem

It's mourning in America again.
New Hillary's granddaughter. ;-)
New Ah.
bcnu,
Mikem

It's mourning in America again.
New Uh, no.
Maybe the fact that no Democrat could beat her says something about her actual popularity ...


Still haven't learned the lesson, I see. What it does say is that the DNC is incredibly adept at pre-selecting a Neo-Republican candidate. See, for example, what a party insider had to say about that.
bcnu,
Mikem

It's mourning in America again.
New We've been through all that.
She won the nominating contest. Get over it.

Name a Democrat who could have beaten her. Explain why that obviously better candidate decided not to run.

Re-litigating the fact that Democrats preferred an actual Democrat is pointless. What's the path forward, with an actual human being, not zombie Eugene McCarthy or whoever, for 2020?

Cheers,
Scott.
New Potentially Uncle Joe
Regards,
-scott
Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
New Ok. He's flamed out 2x before, but maybe he would do better this time.
Yeah, he would be a credible candidate. Potentially. :-)

Thanks.

Cheers,
Scott.
New If not for Neil. That'd come back and bite him in the arse again.
bcnu,
Mikem

It's mourning in America again.
New He wasn't an 8-year VP before.
But yeah, he wouldn't have been a shoo-in vs. Clinton in 2015/6.
Regards,
-scott
Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
Expand Edited by malraux May 24, 2018, 03:52:10 PM EDT
New I think nother thinks that with Comey gone, russians warned
SHE REALLY HAS A SHOT AT IT THIS TIME!!!

which is why in another thread about Mitch Landreau he immediately started bemoaning the last election instead of looking to the future with new faces and places
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
New You're mistaken.
New Let me flip that back at you.
She was such a popular Democrat that a non-Democrat damned near beat her in the Democratic Primary. How popular was she with Democrats again?

I'm telling you, if the DNC chooses another one like her, they'll LOSE again. You're not claiming you know more about the inner workings of that campaign than Donna Brazile are you? Or are you just excusing the unequal treatment by the Party because Bernie Wasn't Even a Democrat!!!111ONE!1?
bcnu,
Mikem

It's mourning in America again.
     Indictment or impeachment? - (rcareaga) - (55)
         "The Constitution is not a suicide pact." - Justice Robert Jackson. - (Another Scott) - (12)
             Might not be a suicide pact, but… - (rcareaga) - (11)
                 Well, you're right about that - (dmcarls) - (10)
                     I take the argument seriously - (rcareaga) - (9)
                         I actually think you might take it seriously - (boxley) - (8)
                             Who the fuck are you, and what have you done w/boxley?? -NT - (rcareaga) - (1)
                                 Indeed The Box wears multi-coloured threads, but do we not mainly pine for - (Ashton)
                             Nit - (drook) - (5)
                                 Thanks for stating that Obvious-ity which moi hadn't copped-to. Either. {sigh} -NT - (Ashton)
                                 yes - (boxley) - (3)
                                     Wrong question - (crazy) - (2)
                                         both of the users pres and sec state were specifically told to check that and why -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                                             Do either have the attention span of a may fly? -NT - (hnick)
         All of this is entertaining. But it leaves the real problem unaddressed. - (mmoffitt) - (41)
             problems is problems - (rcareaga) - (40)
                 Comey and Vlad won't be working together in 2018, 2020, etc. - (Another Scott) - (39)
                     “We can’t give up” - (rcareaga) - (1)
                         538 - Special Elections Since Trump - (Another Scott)
                     Oh, wait - (rcareaga)
                     Once.. well-before-Recently: this sane analysis/prognosis might have flown, albeit "On - (Ashton)
                     next time for president select a leader that a clown car full of clowns can't beat - (boxley) - (34)
                         She's so unpopular that she got millions of votes more than he did... -NT - (Another Scott) - (20)
                             Think of how many the candidate would have gotten without the deep negatives -NT - (boxley) - (19)
                                 She's so horribly unpopular but she got more votes. Hmmm... - (Another Scott) - (18)
                                     “Who was supposed to beat her in this alternative universe?” - (rcareaga) - (8)
                                         Iknowright!! -NT - (Another Scott)
                                         2020 how about someone not affiliated with Clinton cartel? -NT - (boxley) - (6)
                                             Name someone that you think would win. Quit blaming the Clintons. -NT - (Another Scott) - (5)
                                                 He's right to blame the Clintons. - (mmoffitt) - (4)
                                                     Blah, blah, blah. - (Another Scott) - (3)
                                                         He left 18 years ago, but his influence obviously didn't. What's "Charlotte Never" about? -NT - (mmoffitt) - (2)
                                                             Hillary's granddaughter. ;-) -NT - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                                                 Ah. -NT - (mmoffitt)
                                     Uh, no. - (mmoffitt) - (8)
                                         We've been through all that. - (Another Scott) - (7)
                                             Potentially Uncle Joe -NT - (malraux) - (5)
                                                 Ok. He's flamed out 2x before, but maybe he would do better this time. - (Another Scott) - (4)
                                                     If not for Neil. That'd come back and bite him in the arse again. -NT - (mmoffitt)
                                                     He wasn't an 8-year VP before. - (malraux) - (2)
                                                         I think nother thinks that with Comey gone, russians warned - (boxley) - (1)
                                                             You're mistaken. -NT - (Another Scott)
                                             Let me flip that back at you. - (mmoffitt)
                         Re: next time for president select a leader that a clown car full of clowns can't beat - (rcareaga) - (12)
                             not me, I didnt vote - (boxley) - (11)
                                 NY and CA aren't "the country", but WY is? -NT - (drook) - (1)
                                     You want to expand on that statement? -NT - (boxley)
                                 What about Michigan? - (Another Scott) - (8)
                                     So then.. making a pretty good case for (..in the end) - (Ashton) - (7)
                                         Voting things are being fixed in many areas. MI is spending money, etc. -NT - (Another Scott) - (6)
                                             Will the next Democratic nominee actually go to Wisconsin? Just asking... -NT - (mmoffitt) - (5)
                                                 She got more votes than Feingold. Hmm.... -NT - (Another Scott) - (4)
                                                     Yep, she brought down Feingold with her. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (3)
                                                         a > b [ magic happens here ] therefore a < b Is that it? ;-p -NT - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                                             You think she was good for down-ticket candidates? </me falls over> -NT - (mmoffitt) - (1)
                                                                 If she was so unpopular, why did she get more votes? Maybe Feingold was *less* popular. HTH! -NT - (Another Scott)

Holy cran.
274 ms