Last I heard, the offense to be adjudicated is about using an NDA (non-disclosure) rubric to prevent revelation of a politically relevant event ... and variations on that theme.

(A similar case forced Mr. Hart, a promising candidate also for Prez, to withdraw; 'course both then and now: nobody ever lost a bet concerning the average hypocrisy of our Slaver-descendants then and now.)


Was that "criminal influencing of an election?" We'll See. Sorta.
LRPD settles the matter, once again: Egged on by rogue sentient trees, some of them do wish it.