IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New I don't think assembly working was "the lowes-paid"
I'd look at farm hands for lower salary. Nowadays they compare lowest legal salary with the top one, I guess. Back then - no legal minimum, no unemployment insurance either. So the comparison is somewhat unfair.
New That would make it even worse
Back then - no legal minimum, no unemployment insurance either.

So you would expect the lowest paid to have been even lower back then. And I wish I could find the studies to see what the number were actually based on. But even if we're comparing CEOs of industry to farm workers, let's say the lowest-paid assembly line workers are making $15/hour. Farm workers would have to be making $1.50/hour for that to account for the whole difference in the ratio.
===
Microsoft offers them the one thing most business people will pay any price for - the ability to say "we had no choice - everyone's doing it that way." -- [link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=38978|Andrew Grygus]
New Still is
Farm hands are still among the lowest paid jobs around. Many types are not covered by mininum wage laws.

If you take these people into account, the difference between mininum and maximum wages is even higher.

Jay
New Found some numbers
From [link|http://www.ufenet.org/press/archive/Pre_1999/exec_excess_98.html|here]:
To get a good picture of the incredible expanding CEO-worker wage gap, imagine the Washington Monument. CEOs made 326 times the pay of factory workers in 1997 according to Business Week, a big jump from 1996, when they made 209 times as much. If the real 555-foot Washington Monument reflects the average 1997 CEO paycheck, then a scaled-down replica representing average worker pay would be only 21 inches tall.

It's shrinking fast. In 1996, it was 32 inches tall. In 1970, the Workers' Washington Monument was 13 feet, six inches tall -- reflecting a CEO-worker wage ratio of 41 to one.
I don't like thier example. But basically:
  • 1970 -- 41-1
  • 1996 -- 209-1
  • 1997 -- 326-1
And that is comparing them to factory workers, not farm labor.

Another set of [link|http://www.nwlaborpress.org/0502.html|numbers].
===
Microsoft offers them the one thing most business people will pay any price for - the ability to say "we had no choice - everyone's doing it that way." -- [link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=38978|Andrew Grygus]
     What is wrong with business today? - (orion) - (54)
         Kill all the lawyers -NT - (bepatient)
         It depends on the kind of business - (ben_tilly)
         Litany of woe - (JayMehaffey)
         Oh, a very, very long time ago - (Andrew Grygus) - (6)
             Re: Robber Barons - (drewk) - (5)
                 Athletes and Movie Stars - (bepatient)
                 I don't think assembly working was "the lowes-paid" - (Arkadiy) - (3)
                     That would make it even worse - (drewk)
                     Still is - (JayMehaffey) - (1)
                         Found some numbers - (drewk)
         Simple answer: - (jb4) - (33)
             Shocking... - (ChrisR) - (32)
                 Yes making money - (orion)
                 Nice try... - (jb4) - (30)
                     Nope, that's *still* not the purpose of a business - (drewk) - (22)
                         Slight difference. - (Arkadiy) - (1)
                             Hard to say it is for - (ben_tilly)
                         OK, fair enough... - (jb4) - (19)
                             Stockholders = Investors - (ChrisR) - (18)
                                 Good explanation. - (a6l6e6x)
                                 Yeah, I can see those dirty fingernails, alright... - (jb4) - (16)
                                     Invalid assumption - (ChrisR) - (15)
                                         OK, now I got you... - (jb4) - (3)
                                             Side bets - (ChrisR) - (2)
                                                 I apparently didn't play at your casino... - (jb4) - (1)
                                                     The analogy assumes... - (ChrisR)
                                         While I agree, that's kind of orthogonal - (drewk) - (10)
                                             Mixing up cause and effect - again. - (Arkadiy) - (6)
                                                 There's a distinction - (drewk) - (5)
                                                     How the hell did it come to exist - (Arkadiy) - (4)
                                                         You're still focused on *why you would invest* - (drewk) - (3)
                                                             Darn right I am. - (Arkadiy)
                                                             Those Dot Coms employed a lot of people... - (ChrisR) - (1)
                                                                 I think that your sane exposition makes clearer the - (Ashton)
                                             On movies - (ChrisR) - (2)
                                                 Oh I *know* it's wishful thinking - (drewk)
                                                 "Everybody wants money. That's why they call it 'money'." -NT - (jb4)
                     It's all about making money. - (ChrisR) - (6)
                         This simple 'logic' might have sufficed before - (Ashton)
                         Bullshit. - (CRConrad) - (4)
                             You are correct sir - (orion)
                             Well said, Sir Cyclic... - (jb4)
                             Could be? - (ChrisR) - (1)
                                 A nice rebuttal.____But - (Ashton)
         It comes down to greed. - (tuberculosis) - (8)
             Re: It comes down to greed. - (Arkadiy) - (7)
                 'Discretion' manages to put an upper-limit on 'wants'. - (Ashton)
                 Re: It comes down to greed. - (tuberculosis) - (5)
                     Yes it does. - (Arkadiy) - (4)
                         I don't get your point. - (tuberculosis) - (3)
                             But 'quantizing' greed may be the Red Herring - (Ashton)
                             My point is... - (Arkadiy) - (1)
                                 Well I'm in a rare position this week - (tuberculosis)
         Re: What is wrong with business: the pictorial answer - (Ashton)

Solar-powered!
217 ms