If she was using it from a position of privilege, then I believe that's a subversion of the intent.
It has in the past been difficult to know definitively as well. My family was convinced, to the extent of having photographic and written evidence, that my great-grandmother was Obedjiwan. It turns out that the evidence was misinterpreted and that the individual in question (who was very much Obedjiwan) was actually a sister in-law of my great-grandmother's instead. We didn't figure this out until my mother had a DNA test done very recently. If Warren hasn't had that test done then she should, but it can be easy to make that mistake without it.
Even if that had been the case, I don't believe my family would have right to take advantage of such things given that we're doing fine without it.
It has in the past been difficult to know definitively as well. My family was convinced, to the extent of having photographic and written evidence, that my great-grandmother was Obedjiwan. It turns out that the evidence was misinterpreted and that the individual in question (who was very much Obedjiwan) was actually a sister in-law of my great-grandmother's instead. We didn't figure this out until my mother had a DNA test done very recently. If Warren hasn't had that test done then she should, but it can be easy to make that mistake without it.
Even if that had been the case, I don't believe my family would have right to take advantage of such things given that we're doing fine without it.