IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New "A Storm of Silence" re. dis-US meeja Silence amidst All those talking-head hours.
Public Citizen

Mentioned/with/by author on Democracy Now.

A few conclusions stand out:
• ABC and NBC did not mention climate change in the context of Harvey at all.8 Only one other news source, The New York Post, failed to clear that minimal hurdle.
• Climate coverage was highly concentrated among a handful of outlets. The top four outlets by volume of pieces that mention climate (The Washington Post, CNN, The Houston Chronicle, and The New York Times) produced 72 percent of pieces that mention it (98 pieces). The remaining 28 percent of coverage, 38 pieces, was scattered across 10 sources. That figure includes three pieces that deny any connection between climate change and Harvey, as well as two more that give voice to deniers or skeptics. (Again, three sources failed to mention climate change at all.)
• Only five outlets covered all seven aspects of the climate issue that this analysis considered: CNN, The Houston Chronicle, The L.A. Times, The New York Times, and The Washington Post. The Denver Post, Time, and USA Today covered six of seven. The Chicago Tribune covered just two. Despite running five pieces that mentioned climate change, The Wall Street Journal covered only one aspect of the issue that this analysis considered.

[. . .]



Is we learning yet? ..even a little-bit?

No?
Ignorance + cowardice; put these two together and whatcha get is: a place where you wouldn't want to live. ✓✓
New sigh "ABC and NBC did not mention climate change in the context of Harvey at all"
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
New Eww, Bing?
--

Drew
New yeah, think of how much more I could have found using a real search engine :-)
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
New Bing Images >>>>>> Google Images
New Interface or quality of results?
--

Drew
New Must be pretty crowded in that Special=3% bathwater (in which you drown the idea-babies)
Was not *the Point* about "mentions../ or Not.. of the idea of 'Global Warming'" .??. a simple phrase which also does not allow the-question-to-be-begged of:
Whether-or-Not [Heh, Weather or not?] Homo-sap contributed mightily To The Change, as in
..that familiar symbol in Lots of formulae as describe things..

∆ (x, say) meaning "A. Change-in ___"

NOT about previous weather events and their pix. {{sheesh}}|
New here, you might enjoy this link
Even as we worked to divine exactly where the hurricanes would land, a media narrative began to form linking the devastating storms to climate change. Some found it ironic that states represented by “climate deniers” were being pummeled by hurricanes. Alarmists reveled in the irony that Houston, home to petrochemical plants, was flooded by Harvey, while others gleefully reported that President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago might be inundated by Irma.
medja was on it. https://www.wsj.com/articles/climate-change-hype-doesnt-help-1505672774
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
     "A Storm of Silence" re. dis-US meeja Silence amidst All those talking-head hours. - (Ashton) - (8)
         sigh "ABC and NBC did not mention climate change in the context of Harvey at all" - (boxley) - (7)
             Eww, Bing? -NT - (drook) - (3)
                 yeah, think of how much more I could have found using a real search engine :-) -NT - (boxley)
                 Bing Images >>>>>> Google Images -NT - (pwhysall) - (1)
                     Interface or quality of results? -NT - (drook)
             Must be pretty crowded in that Special=3% bathwater (in which you drown the idea-babies) - (Ashton) - (2)
                 here, you might enjoy this link - (boxley) - (1)
                     Typical Cato sophistry. - (Another Scott)

That’s a great, great story. Therefore, it’s too good to be true.
105 ms