IWETHEY v. 0.3.0
|
TODO
1,095 registered users | 0
active users
| 0 LpH |
Statistics
Login
|
Create New User
Welcome to IWETHEY!
IWETHEY Home
/
IWETHEY Board
/
Politics Forum
/
You sure you want to go there?
Post #419,969
by
drook
8/25/17 9:56:56 AM
8/25/17 9:56:56 AM
Reply
You sure you want to go there?
If his reasoning is so faulty you won't give him credit for a positive concept, then you can't give him fault for the negative ones.
--
Drew
Post #419,982
by
Ashton
8/25/17 4:14:48 PM
8/25/17 4:14:48 PM
Reply
Umm, where is that 'Writ-for-textbook-adornment' ?
IIR~C the overall-mood there was about Hopes in that --> Direction, so any credit is Shared-already. Boolean has its limits, (I have wotted.)
;^>
of cornerstones and plinths
- (
rcareaga
)
- (29)
- Aug. 18, 2017, 03:57:08 PM EDT
Re: the common soldiers of the Waffen SS
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (28)
- Aug. 18, 2017, 04:19:13 PM EDT
Yeah, Bitburg
- (
rcareaga
)
- (1)
- Aug. 18, 2017, 06:35:56 PM EDT
I remember Ross.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- Aug. 21, 2017, 08:30:40 AM EDT
How is that hypocritical?
- (
drook
)
- (3)
- Aug. 18, 2017, 08:06:30 PM EDT
"widely suspected"
- (
Ashton
)
- Aug. 18, 2017, 10:07:59 PM EDT
And yet, he persisted.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (1)
- Aug. 21, 2017, 08:47:32 AM EDT
(I bloody-well visited THAT pernicious Place/also described an odd event--in these parts.)
- (
Ashton
)
- Aug. 21, 2017, 05:27:33 PM EDT
Huge diff. Says so right in the first sentence of the NYT article:
- (
CRConrad
)
- (21)
- Aug. 21, 2017, 04:56:43 AM EDT
Ellie Wiesel thought I did.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (20)
- Aug. 22, 2017, 08:36:37 AM EDT
Well-done, young Nazi-Stalker! (one of the few [+] connotations of that word? :-)
-NT
- (
Ashton
)
- Aug. 21, 2017, 05:13:19 PM EDT
They were a) actual corpses, not statues; b) 2.5 % Waffen-SS, 97.5 % Wehrmacht.
- (
CRConrad
)
- (18)
- Aug. 24, 2017, 09:38:59 AM EDT
Re: He could be wrong, and there he was;
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (17)
- Aug. 24, 2017, 11:49:18 AM EDT
Intent matters
- (
drook
)
- (12)
- Aug. 24, 2017, 12:29:29 PM EDT
Yes, it does.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (8)
- Aug. 24, 2017, 01:06:29 PM EDT
Do you know the difference between "action" and "intent"?
-NT
- (
drook
)
- (1)
- Aug. 24, 2017, 02:23:36 PM EDT
One more time, slowly.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- Aug. 24, 2017, 03:40:40 PM EDT
You're still just as wrong.
- (
CRConrad
)
- (5)
- Aug. 25, 2017, 02:17:36 AM EDT
Re: You're still just as wrong.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (4)
- Aug. 25, 2017, 08:30:12 AM EDT
Heh
- (
drook
)
- (3)
- Aug. 25, 2017, 09:49:55 AM EDT
I'm sorry. I didn't know you were so unfamiliar with English.
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (2)
- Aug. 25, 2017, 10:01:57 AM EDT
More
- (
drook
)
- (1)
- Aug. 25, 2017, 10:13:21 AM EDT
Preamble qualified all of that as "In my view." HTH. Again. Context is everything.
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- Aug. 25, 2017, 10:44:58 AM EDT
There can be 'intent' ... clouded with umm.. ... insouciance?
- (
Ashton
)
- (2)
- Aug. 24, 2017, 02:47:35 PM EDT
You sure you want to go there?
- (
drook
)
- (1)
- Aug. 25, 2017, 09:56:56 AM EDT
Umm, where is that 'Writ-for-textbook-adornment' ?
- (
Ashton
)
- Aug. 25, 2017, 04:14:48 PM EDT
There is also significant difference among . . .
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- (3)
- Aug. 24, 2017, 02:59:27 PM EDT
Heh. "Administrative". You mean like scheduling trains?
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- (1)
- Aug. 24, 2017, 03:43:17 PM EDT
Yup, and placing orders for more ovens.
- (
Andrew Grygus
)
- Aug. 24, 2017, 04:29:23 PM EDT
Disctinctions are of scale only
- (
scoenye
)
- Aug. 25, 2017, 03:54:24 PM EDT
i
we
they
.org
We sell COFFEE-flavored coffee.
84 ms