Post #415,476
11/14/16 2:48:50 PM
11/14/16 2:48:50 PM
|

Thanks for the pointer.
It's a good, thought-provoking essay.
But, man, the brush he uses is so very broad... And liberal politics doesn't exist in a vacuum. Were's the counter-point of the GOP and the press demonizing Hillary for 30+ years?
The counter-example, that he mentions briefly, is Obama. I don't think I've ever seen a national politician with more empathy. He can put himself in anyone's shoes - even those who hate him - better than anyone. He's the Anti-Smug. It didn't help soften his opposition by the GOP - it was ramped up 100 fold instead.
Obama's empathy didn't matter. The supposedly monolithic WWC hated him and all he stood for anyway.
There's a place for empathy and talking together. But these "smug liberals" he's railing against have much, much less power than Rensin would lead us to believe. It would be good to see him do a similar essay on the Teabaggers... (Maybe he has - I haven't looked.)
Three states, and less than 100,000 votes, determined the outcome of the election. I'm not willing to throw up my hands and say we were too smug and we have too much disdain for the working class (including the WWC, including the male WWC). Yes, blaming the voters is stupid and counter-productive. But let's be smart about the conclusions we draw from Tuesday's results.
My $0.02.
Thanks again.
Cheers, Scott.
|
Post #415,477
11/14/16 5:04:28 PM
11/14/16 5:04:28 PM
|

the guy that told white folks to get to the back of the bus isnt smug?
the god and guns guy? maybe it was distain and not smug, I dont know.
always look out for number one and don't step in number two
|
Post #415,479
11/14/16 6:30:53 PM
11/14/16 6:30:53 PM
|

To whom do you refer?
I have a feeling I know, but please to go on record.
|
Post #415,481
11/14/16 6:37:37 PM
11/14/16 6:37:37 PM
|

Re: To whom do you refer?
always look out for number one and don't step in number two
|
Post #415,482
11/14/16 7:29:27 PM
11/14/16 7:29:27 PM
|

Re: To whom do you refer?
I look in vain for a reference to "white folks" in the quoted sentences. But I can't hear the voices in your head that tell you what Obama really meant.
|
Post #415,484
11/14/16 9:33:41 PM
11/14/16 9:33:41 PM
|

Well, the article (not the quote) does say it, at least close
But even I can quickly visualize it based on the actual quote. It is talking about non middle class GOP members, of which the vast majority are old white people.
|
Post #415,485
11/14/16 9:43:25 PM
11/14/16 9:43:25 PM
|

from the context...
I make it GOP officeholders. But as I said, I lack boxley's keen hallucinatory insights.
|
Post #415,488
11/14/16 9:51:17 PM
11/14/16 9:51:17 PM
|

Re: from the context...
yeah, from the context all right. So who used to be on the back of the bus? Circa 1950's in the south it was republicans. It was very clear what he meant and he used the "out of context, I really meant republicans in the congress and senate" get out of jail free card. Every black person in america and some of us whites got that.
always look out for number one and don't step in number two
|
Post #415,489
11/14/16 11:46:16 PM
11/14/16 11:46:16 PM
|

As I said, hallucinatory.
|
Post #415,494
11/15/16 10:36:58 AM
11/15/16 10:36:58 AM
|

ask a black person what it meant
always look out for number one and don't step in number two
|
Post #415,490
11/15/16 12:17:24 AM
11/15/16 12:17:24 AM
|

MediaMatters.
http://politicalcorrection.org/factcheck/201010310007 - quoting Obama Look, I've been using this analogy as I travel the country. Imagine the Republicans driving the economy into a ditch. And it's a deep ditch. It's a big ditch. And somehow they walked away from the accident, and we put on our boots and we rappelled down into the ditch -- me and Jack and Sheldon and Jim and Patrick. We've been pushing, pushing, trying to get that car out of the ditch.
And meanwhile, the Republicans are standing there, sipping on a Slurpee. (Laughter.) Fanning themselves. We're hot and sweaty and pushing, and they're kicking dirt into the ditch. (Laughter.) Getting it into our faces. But that's okay. We said -- every once in a while we'd ask them, "Do you want to come down and help?" They'd say, "No, but you're not pushing the right way, though. Push harder."
Finally, we get this car out of the ditch, and it's banged up. It needs some body work, needs a tune-up. But it's pointing in the right direction. The engine is turning and it's ready to go. And we suddenly get this tap on our shoulders. We look back, who is it? The Republicans. And they're saying, "Excuse me, we want the keys back." You can't have the keys back. You don't know how to drive! (Applause.) You can't have them back. Can't do it. (Applause.) Not after we've worked this hard.
We can't have special interests sitting shotgun. (Laughter.) You know, we got to have middle-class families up in front. (Applause.) We can't -- we don't mind the Republicans joining us. They can come for the ride, but they got to sit in back. (Laughter.)
Look, these two years have been incredibly difficult. And not every decision we've made has always been popular, but they've been the right things to do because you sent me there -- you sent me there not to do what was easy but do what was right. That's why you sent me there. (Applause.) HTH. Cheers, Scott.
|
Post #415,492
11/15/16 9:37:41 AM
11/15/16 9:37:41 AM
|

Obviously contempt for white folk
Thanks for the fuller context, Scott. Wonder why box and his source didn't feel like providing that? Oh, wait.
cordially,
|
Post #415,495
11/15/16 10:38:35 AM
11/15/16 10:42:03 AM
|

sorry mediamatters is not a valid site for anything. It is no better than the wnd site for facts
That's a Glenn Beck-inspired race-baiting twist on Obama's months-old metaphor from the same article, then it proceeds to twiat a republicans words then meanders into wholesale bullshit about what the president meant he said.
always look out for number one and don't step in number two

Edited by boxley
Nov. 15, 2016, 10:42:03 AM EST
|
Post #415,496
11/15/16 10:41:07 AM
11/15/16 10:41:07 AM
|

Yeah, full quotes in context is bad. Touche'. ;-p
|
Post #415,497
11/15/16 10:42:51 AM
11/15/16 10:42:51 AM
|

too bad it wasnt, it was what they claimed he said
always look out for number one and don't step in number two
|
Post #415,498
11/15/16 12:31:48 PM
11/15/16 12:31:48 PM
|

He's told the same anecdote/story many times. That seems to be the exact quote used in your link...
|
Post #415,505
11/16/16 8:13:33 AM
11/16/16 8:13:33 AM
|

Those "smug liberals" gave you HRC. How'd that work out for you?
bcnu, Mikem
I think religion should be treated with ridicule, hatred and contempt. And I claim that right. Christopher Hitchens.
|
Post #415,506
11/16/16 9:37:12 AM
11/16/16 9:37:12 AM
|

Hillary won the primary with millions more votes than St. Bernard. HTH.
Too bad democracy is so horrible, eh?
Cheers, Scott.
|
Post #415,507
11/16/16 9:38:44 AM
11/16/16 9:38:44 AM
|

she sure did,so did taft back in the day
always look out for number one and don't step in number two
|
Post #415,508
11/16/16 9:42:38 AM
11/16/16 9:42:38 AM
|

And?
What's the alternative? Pick the person that the majority of people voting in the party process didn't want?
Continuing to argue about Hillary isn't going to fix anything that Trump's Minions are trying to do...
Cheers, Scott.
|
Post #415,509
11/16/16 10:18:49 AM
11/16/16 10:18:49 AM
|

your bewailing the clinton loss isnt going to fix trump either
If you are over it I am over it glad twitter booted alt right. Twitter is a medium not the message, asshats do not get a free ride, they can start their own company call it fucker and offer free sign ups
always look out for number one and don't step in number two
|
Post #415,510
11/16/16 10:29:03 AM
11/16/16 10:29:03 AM
|

Twitter did what now?
|
Post #415,511
11/16/16 10:41:58 AM
11/16/16 10:41:58 AM
|

Re: Twitter did what now?
always look out for number one and don't step in number two
|
Post #415,512
11/16/16 10:47:54 AM
11/16/16 10:47:54 AM
|

Spectacular timing
|
Post #415,523
11/16/16 8:26:36 PM
11/16/16 8:26:36 PM
|

How many?
bcnu, Mikem
I think religion should be treated with ridicule, hatred and contempt. And I claim that right. Christopher Hitchens.
|
Post #415,524
11/16/16 8:48:25 PM
11/16/16 8:48:25 PM
|

and dont forget the illegals and the dead who voted in the general
always look out for number one and don't step in number two
|
Post #415,528
11/16/16 10:37:43 PM
11/16/16 10:37:43 PM
|

True believer writes true-believer opinion piece.
|
Post #415,535
11/17/16 7:34:27 AM
11/17/16 7:34:27 AM
|

That was July 6
And on July 22 the Democratic email dump made clear that it wasn't "fair and square".
So pointing out what Bernie believed at the time with limited information really isn't relevant.
|
Post #415,536
11/17/16 10:17:41 AM
11/17/16 10:17:41 AM
|

Yet he was "vigorously" campaigning for her in September...
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/09/30/bernie-sanders-step-up-campaign-schedule-hillary-clinton/91342564/Sen. Bernie Sanders is about to start tearing up the campaign trail.
The Vermont independent will campaign for Hillary Clinton in the battleground states of Iowa and Minnesota on Monday and Tuesday, and appearances elsewhere are in the works.
“He’s talking about traveling all over the country to help Secretary Clinton," Sanders spokesman Michael Briggs said Friday, adding that Sanders also will help other candidates and discuss ballot issues he cares about.
Sanders spent most of August writing a book but has since campaigned for Clinton in Ohio (once) and New Hampshire (twice). An event Wednesday in the Granite State was the first joint appearance for Sanders and Clinton since he endorsed her in July. The event aimed to win more support for Clinton from millennials who supported Sanders in the primaries. Clinton is underperforming among young adults, a significant percentage of whom have turned to third-party candidates. Usually when one feels cheated, one doesn't work to elect the cheater. FWIW. Cheers, Scott.
|
Post #415,540
11/17/16 12:42:06 PM
11/17/16 12:42:06 PM
|

He made a simple decision
Trump or her. Far lesser of 2 evils. I admire him for it. And he is a politician, which means he knows when to keep his mouth shut if it means furthering his own agenda, no matter how cheated be may feel.
|
Post #415,541
11/17/16 12:46:54 PM
11/17/16 12:46:54 PM
|

And yet too many of Bernie's supporters couldn't make the same calculation. Curious. :-(
|
Post #415,543
11/17/16 2:40:02 PM
11/17/16 2:40:02 PM
|

They are not politicians
Average people throw hissy fits. The saying "cut off nose to spite his face" apply to most people, not just the exceptionionally stupid. A very small subset of the population are truly logical. Nothing curious about it.
|
Post #415,544
11/17/16 3:38:00 PM
11/17/16 3:38:00 PM
|

No, they are morons - just like Trump voters.
|
Post #415,570
11/21/16 8:24:09 AM
11/21/16 8:24:09 AM
|

Or live in a place where a vote doesn't matter.
bcnu, Mikem
I think religion should be treated with ridicule, hatred and contempt. And I claim that right. Christopher Hitchens.
|
Post #415,572
11/21/16 9:59:04 AM
11/21/16 9:59:04 AM
|

Votes always matter. They're precious and shouldn't be thrown away.
|
Post #415,576
11/21/16 12:58:17 PM
11/21/16 12:58:17 PM
|

Voting for HRC in Indiana in 2016 is the essence of throwing one's vote away.
bcnu, Mikem
I think religion should be treated with ridicule, hatred and contempt. And I claim that right. Christopher Hitchens.
|
Post #415,579
11/21/16 1:48:15 PM
11/21/16 1:48:15 PM
|

Things don't change until they do. Every vote matters.
|
Post #415,581
11/21/16 3:18:11 PM
11/21/16 3:18:11 PM
|

Nonsense. The Democratic Candidate losing Indiana in the general was a fait accompli.
Exactly as I predicted. Although if the youth can still manage to trust our political system enough to participate after the betrayal of Obama, then Indiana could go for the Democratic candidate again as it did in 2008. But that would be if and only if Bernie is the candidate. ... Clinton has about as much chance of carrying Indiana as she does of getting my vote in the primary. http://forum.iwethey.org/forum/post/406870/
bcnu, Mikem
I think religion should be treated with ridicule, hatred and contempt. And I claim that right. Christopher Hitchens.
|
Post #415,583
11/21/16 3:40:12 PM
11/21/16 3:40:12 PM
|

Meh.
Yes, the polling said she wasn't going to win IN and she didn't. Congratulations. That doesn't mean that people shouldn't have voted for her. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election_in_Indiana,_2008#PollingPre-election polling was always tight, although McCain generally had a slight lead in 3 poll averages throughout the entire general election, including the final weeks of the election. "McCain's ahead, so I guess it's hopeless" is self-fulfilling. Cheers, Scott.
|
Post #415,585
11/21/16 4:36:53 PM
11/21/16 4:36:53 PM
|

Nice Try.
I wasn't going by polls. Anyone who had been at least half conscious for the past 30 years would have recognized that she did not have a chance in Indiana without having to bother looking at a poll.
bcnu, Mikem
I think religion should be treated with ridicule, hatred and contempt. And I claim that right. Christopher Hitchens.
|
Post #415,588
11/21/16 4:54:39 PM
11/21/16 4:54:39 PM
|

Heh.
I guess we would all be better off if we ignored evidence and just relied on your gut, eh?
(sigh)
Cheers, Scott.
|
Post #415,592
11/22/16 8:02:28 AM
11/22/16 8:02:28 AM
|

It's called observation.
bcnu, Mikem
I think religion should be treated with ridicule, hatred and contempt. And I claim that right. Christopher Hitchens.
|