IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Politics Forum / Serious question.
Post #414,798
by mmoffitt
10/24/16 12:31:26 PM
10/24/16 12:31:26 PM
Reply
New Serious question.
I know you don't like rt.com. I think you don't like counterpunch.org. I won't ask for your list of "approved" sources, because I can probably guess those: HRC for President campaign, whitehouse.gov, NY Times, LA Times, Washington Post, CNN, CBS, etc. ad all other corporate owned media outlets. So, I'll ask which sources you believe are unreliable. Do you have a current list?
bcnu,
Mikem

I think religion should be treated with ridicule, hatred and contempt. And I claim that right.
Christopher Hitchens.
Post #414,804
by Another Scott
10/24/16 12:40:13 PM
10/24/16 12:40:13 PM
Reply
New Depends on the context. ;-)
Post #414,808
by a6l6e6x
Picture of a6l6e6x
10/24/16 12:45:06 PM
10/24/16 12:45:06 PM
Reply
New The BBC and PBS are pretty good as sources.
Alex

"There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that "my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge."

-- Isaac Asimov
     hey nother serious question - (boxley) - (20) - Oct. 24, 2016, 12:29:32 AM EDT
         From a casual glance - (hnick) - Oct. 24, 2016, 05:49:11 AM EDT
         Taking things out of context isn't way to enlightenment. - (Another Scott) - (5) - Oct. 24, 2016, 07:32:30 AM EDT
             not taking anything out of context, was looking at the Atlas project info - (boxley) - (4) - Oct. 24, 2016, 12:04:28 PM EDT
                 I don't see what Wikileaks has to do with polling, but YMMV. - (Another Scott) - (3) - Oct. 24, 2016, 12:18:37 PM EDT
                     Serious question. - (mmoffitt) - (2) - Oct. 24, 2016, 12:31:26 PM EDT
                         Depends on the context. ;-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Oct. 24, 2016, 12:40:13 PM EDT
                         The BBC and PBS are pretty good as sources. -NT - (a6l6e6x) - Oct. 24, 2016, 12:45:06 PM EDT
         Over-sampling isn't nefarious - (malraux) - (11) - Oct. 24, 2016, 12:26:13 PM EDT
             Thank you. -NT - (Another Scott) - Oct. 24, 2016, 12:30:54 PM EDT
             Specifically ... - (drook) - (3) - Oct. 24, 2016, 12:34:31 PM EDT
                 Yes, that's the LAT poll I mentioned. - (malraux) - (2) - Oct. 24, 2016, 12:37:34 PM EDT
                     Yes, that one - (drook) - (1) - Oct. 24, 2016, 12:40:06 PM EDT
                         Exactly. -NT - (malraux) - Oct. 24, 2016, 12:40:31 PM EDT
             Also too. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Oct. 24, 2016, 12:39:38 PM EDT
                 I totally missed that - (drook) - Oct. 24, 2016, 12:43:31 PM EDT
             thats what I was looking for, thanks -NT - (boxley) - Oct. 24, 2016, 02:15:13 PM EDT
             More from The Atlantic - (malraux) - Oct. 24, 2016, 06:31:44 PM EDT
             It's almost as if... - (pwhysall) - (1) - Oct. 25, 2016, 04:55:46 AM EDT
                 :-)! -NT - (a6l6e6x) - Oct. 25, 2016, 03:25:16 PM EDT
         PK weighs in: Oversampling at the Fed! - (Another Scott) - Oct. 24, 2016, 07:01:15 PM EDT

I like my women unassembled, without the hardware already bolted on.
99 ms