More dangerous than a "No Fly Zone" over Syria?

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #414,441 by mmoffitt 10/11/16 1:49:50 PM 10/11/16 1:49:50 PM Reply	More dangerous than a "No Fly Zone" over Syria? Followed by, perhaps, a "No Fly Zone" over Ukraine? What do you think our reaction would be to Putin suggesting that, in order to save innocent Palestinian lives, they needed to establish a "No Fly Zone" over Israel?
Post #414,442 by malraux 10/11/16 1:53:41 PM 10/11/16 1:53:41 PM Reply	Yes, absolutely. You apparently didn't understand the point of that essay. Regards, -scott Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
Post #414,444 by mmoffitt 10/11/16 2:00:46 PM 10/11/16 2:00:46 PM Reply	Sure I did. I just reject the idea that NATO makes the world safer.

On pearl-clutching and wars - (malraux) - (8) - Oct. 11, 2016, 11:00:24 AM EDT

The money quote IMO - (drook) - Oct. 11, 2016, 12:21:28 PM EDT

Feh. In a world without the Warsaw Pact, you don't need NATO. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (6) - Oct. 11, 2016, 01:19:03 PM EDT

Where is that world? -NT - (drook) - (1) - Oct. 11, 2016, 01:31:18 PM EDT

This one. Since 3/31/1991. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Oct. 11, 2016, 01:48:16 PM EDT

Neither of those existed before WWI - (malraux) - (3) - Oct. 11, 2016, 01:47:33 PM EDT

More dangerous than a "No Fly Zone" over Syria? - (mmoffitt) - (2) - Oct. 11, 2016, 01:49:50 PM EDT

Yes, absolutely. - (malraux) - (1) - Oct. 11, 2016, 01:53:41 PM EDT

Personally, I use pure auravedic grade ground hing, that way I know exactly what I'm getting.
37 ms