IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Oh my, not political reality
Of course they can have multiple positions. When you are trying to manipulate opponents to support something, NEVER tell them everything.

Unless you are a moron.
New Let me see if I have this correctly.
Hillary publicly states her position on a policy is X. Privately her position is Y.

She goes to Private Meeting with her actual constituents (large Wall St. Banksters) and says, "Don't worry about my public statement of X, you know, my real position is Y."

You're saying that the public is not the one being fooled, it is the donors who are being fooled?
New Could be either
Or could be both. She has certain goals that could conflict with either. Maybe someone has a litmus test and will donate or vote for her if she passes, and not if she fails.

So she walks a careful line. EVERY politician has to do this is they need to cobble a coalition of people together.

Reality is complex. Sorry.
New Identifying a liar isn't, fortunately.
New And all here owe their souls to the Bankster/Big Pharma/Multi-national/MIC as well. :0(
Expand Edited by mmoffitt Oct. 10, 2016, 11:11:59 AM EDT
New s/successful politicians/human beings/g
     now if the bucket of losers could join the basket of deplorables in a third party.... - (boxley) - (25)
         Wikileaks is 'owned' by the Russians now. Don't trust anything from Assange - (Another Scott) - (22)
             It must be true, I just read that on the internets! :) - (a6l6e6x)
             100% accuracy to this point weakens your call to "get behind dear leader." - (mmoffitt) - (19)
                 Re: 100% accuracy to this point weakens your call to "get behind dear leader." - (Another Scott) - (11)
                     blm is behind this email dump? ok if you say so -NT - (boxley) - (10)
                         Snopes better? - (Another Scott) - (9)
                             a lot better, so just because it is not in a released email doesnt mean she has not said that :-) -NT - (boxley) - (8)
                                 Curious - (drook) - (7)
                                     Hillary stole Box's Lincoln. HTH. -NT - (Another Scott)
                                     damning evidence that trump is an asswipe? that was there before the primaries - (boxley) - (5)
                                         Stipulate that Bill is an asshole for the sake of argument - (drook) - (2)
                                             when said woman spun sexual assault accusers were lying bimbos -NT - (boxley)
                                             No, but for calling a victim "a narcisstic looney toon". That's on her. And no apology for that. -NT - (mmoffitt)
                                         Why should she apologise? - (pwhysall) - (1)
                                             Hillary should apologize for what she called Bill's victims. HTH. -NT - (mmoffitt)
                 Oh my, not political reality - (crazy) - (6)
                     Let me see if I have this correctly. - (mmoffitt) - (5)
                         Could be either - (crazy) - (4)
                             Identifying a liar isn't, fortunately. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (3)
                                 Agreed - (crazy) - (2)
                                     And all here owe their souls to the Bankster/Big Pharma/Multi-national/MIC as well. :0( -NT - (mmoffitt)
                                     s/successful politicians/human beings/g -NT - (pwhysall)
             if the Russians own anything against clinton the we are all tovaritches eh? - (boxley)
         I am not Sidney Blumenthal - (Another Scott) - (1)
             It's not bad in the way you think - (drook)

I promise you that if I am compelled to turn to the Dark Side on this issue you will come to yearn for the suave ripostes of CRConrad.
181 ms