Because every time someone gets close to taking a real step in that direction the purity ponies who want a giant leap give a big "fuck you" to the pragmatists and leave the vandals in charge for another round.
Serious answer
Because every time someone gets close to taking a real step in that direction the purity ponies who want a giant leap give a big "fuck you" to the pragmatists and leave the vandals in charge for another round. -- Drew |
|
By "Pragmatists" you mean capitulators, right?
Follow up question. Canada didn't need a baby step, why do we? Pick (1) or (2) from previous question. |
|
Canada's system started in a few provinces then went national.
It took decades. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hcs-sss/pubs/system-regime/2011-hcs-sss/index-eng.php Before World War II, health care in Canada was, for the most part, privately delivered and funded. In 1947, the government of Saskatchewan introduced a province-wide, universal hospital care plan. By 1950, both British Columbia and Alberta had similar plans. The federal government passed the Hospital Insurance and Diagnostic Services Act in 1957, which offered to reimburse, or cost share, one-half of provincial and territorial costs for specified hospital and diagnostic services. This Act provided for publicly administered universal coverage for a specific set of services under uniform terms and conditions. Four years later, all the provinces and territories had agreed to provide publicly funded inpatient hospital and diagnostic services. HTH. Cheers, Scott. |