IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Why there might not be a lag
According to the source data, both Aids and homicide had significant impact on black male life expectancy. Both of those could change abruptly with policy shifts.
--

Drew
New Good points, but ...
It takes time to get people confirmed, for new policies to get drawn up, advertised, take effect, and for the rest of the government to act on them.

Other than moratoriums and the like, it's hard for me to see policy changing in less than 3-6 months under normal circumstances on changing administrations from one party to another.

But you're right that the general point stands - who controls the White House has life-and-death implications for the AA community (and others). The Congress and the Courts matter too, of course.

It's not, "well they're all corrupt anyway, so it doesn't matter". It does matter. A lot.

Cheers,
Scott.
New Absolutely, lots of factors
--

Drew
     One for MM and Box - (Another Scott) - (19)
         useful idiots still exist and that post is pointed right at them -NT - (boxley) - (2)
             Yes, they still exist, but . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
                 ah, the Trumpenlumpen -NT - (boxley)
         Idiots think it can be salvaged. It can't. - (mmoffitt) - (15)
             What if you're wrong? -NT - (Another Scott) - (14)
                 Status quo. That's bad enough. I don't like everyone being owned by Corporations+Banks. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (13)
                     So, you prefer they all be property of "The State" . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
                         Guilty as charged. ;0) - (mmoffitt)
                     Tell that to the American people who will die as the result of new GOP policies. - (Another Scott) - (10)
                         Look at the bottom line from 1992 to 2000 and ask again. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (9)
                             Yes, going up during Clinton admin, what's your point? -NT - (drook) - (8)
                                 Compare slopes 88-92, 92-2000, 2000-2008. It doesn't make his case. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (7)
                                     There's a lag. Film at 11. - (Another Scott) - (3)
                                         Why there might not be a lag - (drook) - (2)
                                             Good points, but ... - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                                 Absolutely, lots of factors -NT - (drook)
                                     Well let's see ... - (drook) - (2)
                                         I misread the chart. Mea Culpa. Apologies, Scott. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (1)
                                             Progress! :-) Don't sweat it. -NT - (Another Scott)

You hijacked the conversation. You get to land it.
124 ms