I'm glad it is. An important part of reading is comprehension.
Context:
And then there's this from you:
I "admit I have no idea why minorities vote the way I do"? This is pointless.
rcareaga:
But seriously: If Clinton has some kind of leg up with minorities, why do you suppose that might be? ... But you allude in passing to her support from the "minority" populace, which has certainly worked to Sanders' disadvantage during the primaries, and it seems odd that you would not address the reasons for their apparent unresponsiveness to Sanders' message.
Me:
I said "built in advantage" only because there was a strong preference by minorities shown for her during the primaries and I have no reason to believe that will somehow disappear in November, two-way or three-way race notwithstanding. ... But if you won't stand for me not speculating about it, all I can say is I suppose it is familiarity.
And then there's this from you:
My point is you admit you have no idea why minorities vote the way you do, yet you base your analysis on your absolute confidence in how these other groups will vote.
I "admit I have no idea why minorities vote the way I do"? This is pointless.
