"Shills"?

Isn't it conceivable instead that people support a candidate because they agree with the totality of their reality, taking into account experience, likelihood of success and policy platform?

So, you support her MIC favoring policies? Her support of TPP? Her support of the XL pipeline? Her unquestioning support of Israel? Her votes in favor of wars? Her coziness with Wall Street? Her opposition to reinstatement of Glass-Stegall? (If so, I hope you enjoy the next economic crash). By "experience" are you referring to the fabulous job she did as Secretary of State in making Egypt, Libya and Syria more democratic and peaceful? Or perhaps it was her job of creating a better relationship among the countries (US and Russia) with the largest stockpiles of nuclear weapons? Does it go back further? To her time on Walmart's Board when they were crushing Union movements? The fact that she will never tell the American People what she said behind closed doors to the bankster class doesn't trouble you at all?

Wow. Just Wow.

Post #409,655 by pwhysall 4/29/16 3:22:12 PM 4/29/16 3:22:12 PM Reply	"Shills"? So anyone who doesn't agree with you must be in the pay of your opponent? Isn't it conceivable instead that people support a candidate because they agree with the totality of their reality, taking into account experience, likelihood of success and policy platform? I don't have a vote, but if I did it would be for HRC. Why? Because people who have spent their careers being contrarians are ill-suited to leadership. Worked example: Jeremy Corbyn.
Post #409,657 by mmoffitt 4/29/16 3:32:55 PM 4/29/16 3:32:55 PM Reply	Good $DEITY. Isn't it conceivable instead that people support a candidate because they agree with the totality of their reality, taking into account experience, likelihood of success and policy platform? So, you support her MIC favoring policies? Her support of TPP? Her support of the XL pipeline? Her unquestioning support of Israel? Her votes in favor of wars? Her coziness with Wall Street? Her opposition to reinstatement of Glass-Stegall? (If so, I hope you enjoy the next economic crash). By "experience" are you referring to the fabulous job she did as Secretary of State in making Egypt, Libya and Syria more democratic and peaceful? Or perhaps it was her job of creating a better relationship among the countries (US and Russia) with the largest stockpiles of nuclear weapons? Does it go back further? To her time on Walmart's Board when they were crushing Union movements? The fact that she will never tell the American People what she said behind closed doors to the bankster class doesn't trouble you at all? Wow. Just Wow.
Post #409,660 by pwhysall 4/29/16 3:58:19 PM 4/29/16 3:58:19 PM Reply	That's one way to answer the question.

Welcome to IWETHEY!