IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Yes that was my take.
But it seemed that Peter had er, directed his casuistry at the Messenger (you) and not at the perp appropriate to this thread.

(Alas, for being as hyperbolic too at times) ..as anyone who got a sign wrong in an expression he thought parabolic?--Oh! those conic sections--hyperbolas surround us. Methinks that we dwell within a world quite more hyper- than not, since the very prefix forces us to contemplate 1/0 and other math simulations of our plight.

aka We still haven't the Foggiest 'where' dwells our so-called Consciousness (or I have entirely missed the awarding of that Nobel.) Hillary doesn't know, either.
New Indeed. Was posted before coffee. Apols.
New De nada
The thread had become somewhat convolute. The spousette speaks of an attorney she's worked with who reduces hostile witnesses to stammering imbecility by such means: "Isn't it true that you would never have failed to neglect this elementary precaution had you not denied to my client that your assurances were not in fact to be doubted unless, etc., etc." Where was I?

cordially,
New Oooh. That's evil. :-)
New And when the witness attempted his halting response
"Answer the question! Yes or no?"

adversarially,
New "two sugars with cream please" would be my answer
of course I has been expert witness
always look out for number one and don't step in number two
Expand Edited by boxley March 2, 2016, 01:29:35 PM EST
     Drum: Liberals need to back off the Trump love. - (Another Scott) - (37)
         He's already hung it up, as has every other Hillary supporter. - (mmoffitt) - (36)
             most psychologists, my arse - (rcareaga) - (35)
                 Agreement with Rand here. - (a6l6e6x) - (1)
                     Unpossible!! -NT - (Another Scott)
                 Not surprised you missed it. - (mmoffitt) - (32)
                     "Uncut" 30 second interview snippet. Hmm... - (Another Scott) - (6)
                         Interesting. - (mmoffitt)
                         Email sent to NPR. - (mmoffitt) - (4)
                             rofl. Nice editorializing. :-) Thanks very much. -NT - (Another Scott)
                             The Clinton Library has the transcript. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                 It's not clear to me that she's disavowing having supported Goldwater. - (mmoffitt) - (1)
                                     ..We never *know* where ANY one of these, salivating at the lobby to Massive-Power ... really STAND - (Ashton)
                     Re: Not surprised you missed it. - (rcareaga) - (24)
                         If you tell me why (at 49) she was "very proud" to have been a Goldwater Girl. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (23)
                             Re: If you tell me why (at 49) she was "very proud" to have been a Goldwater Girl. - (rcareaga) - (22)
                                 I'm sorry, I sound like that by quoting her? - (mmoffitt) - (21)
                                     See above for the full transcript. -NT - (Another Scott) - (20)
                                         sorry, don't you see? - (rcareaga) - (19)
                                             Re: sorry, don't you see? - (pwhysall) - (18)
                                                 ... -NT - (malraux)
                                                 thats just spray from the churning -NT - (boxley)
                                                 You made your [Referent-perp] uncertain. here? Was that intentional or a preterite kinda gotcha..? - (Ashton) - (15)
                                                     Re: You made your [Referent-perp] uncertain... - (rcareaga) - (14)
                                                         Yes that was my take. - (Ashton) - (5)
                                                             Indeed. Was posted before coffee. Apols. -NT - (pwhysall) - (4)
                                                                 De nada - (rcareaga) - (3)
                                                                     Oooh. That's evil. :-) -NT - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                                                         And when the witness attempted his halting response - (rcareaga) - (1)
                                                                             "two sugars with cream please" would be my answer - (boxley)
                                                         Thanks. No, he doesn't. - (mmoffitt) - (7)
                                                             Make sure you let your daughter know that you're Ok with Trump replacing RBG. :-/ -NT - (Another Scott) - (6)
                                                                 Heh. I'm not "okay" with Hillary doing that. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (4)
                                                                     Yeah, but what does your daughter think. -NT - (Another Scott) - (3)
                                                                         I'll ask. But, ... - (mmoffitt) - (2)
                                                                             Thanks for indulging me. :-) - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                                                                 she doesnt balance, she charges :-) -NT - (boxley)
                                                                 Actually I think he would produce a better pick than hillary - (boxley)

I took the liberty of fixing the punctuation.
127 ms