And he won by 22.5%
Which is what I said, no? He outperformed the polls by 5.5%.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/02/09/us/elections/new-hampshire-democrat-poll.html
See above. They didn't tighten, Sanders outperformed.
Sanders won every demographic group in NH except > 65 and > $200K/yr. He also won every category of very liberal, somewhat liberal, and moderate by at least 14 points, 20 points in the case of moderate voters.
I'm sure it's my fault (eh, Peter? ;-), but I'm not quite sure what you're trying to point out here. I don't think that analysis was very accurate. :-)
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/02/09/us/elections/new-hampshire-democrat-poll.html
Still, the results in Iowa suggest that polls in New Hampshire may tighten. That’s because the states look similar demographically. Even taking into account that Sanders lives next door in Vermont, Clinton probably shouldn’t be behind by 17 percentage points in the New Hampshire polling average right now.
See above. They didn't tighten, Sanders outperformed.
Sanders won very liberal voters over Clinton by 19 percentage points, but he lost self-identified somewhat liberals and moderates to Clinton by 6 percentage points and 23 percentage points, respectively. That’s bad for Sanders because even though 68 percent of Iowa Democratic caucus-goers identified as liberal this year, only 47 percent of Democratic primary voters nationwide did so in 2008.
Sanders won every demographic group in NH except > 65 and > $200K/yr. He also won every category of very liberal, somewhat liberal, and moderate by at least 14 points, 20 points in the case of moderate voters.
I'm sure it's my fault (eh, Peter? ;-), but I'm not quite sure what you're trying to point out here. I don't think that analysis was very accurate. :-)