IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New That's yet another a whole can of worms...
Now you start getting into explicit distinctions and exclusion written into the Constitution and how those interact with developments which came much later. Even with that, I don't think there is any doubt the reservations are US dominions.
New the equivelent of states sorta
leaves a gaping hole for law enforcement. State cops cant go there. Tribal cops have to hand felonies over to feds who mostly don't give a shit. Ugly nightmare
always look out for number one and don't step in number two
     Constitutional law professor comments on the Canadian - (malraux) - (11)
         Yup.. [unless QED too..? has been abolished in Newspeak.] -NT - (Ashton)
         Interesting. I'm sure there are good arguments on the other side though. - (Another Scott) - (7)
             But, the Canal Zone was under US jurisdiction at the time.. - (a6l6e6x) - (6)
                 Yup. - (Another Scott)
                 About that military base thingy - (scoenye) - (4)
                     yes and no, Indian Reservations are sovreign, but since 1920 poeple born in them are citizens, sorta -NT - (boxley) - (2)
                         That's yet another a whole can of worms... - (scoenye) - (1)
                             the equivelent of states sorta - (boxley)
                     Panama Canal Zone was more than a military base. - (a6l6e6x)
         Well, we ignored the 12th amendment in 2000, so why does the Constitution matter now? -NT - (mmoffitt)
         well if you are quoting blackstone, he does meet the criteria of being born on english soil :-) - (boxley)

Eight Megs And Constantly Swapping
91 ms