IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New yes and no, Indian Reservations are sovreign, but since 1920 poeple born in them are citizens, sorta
always look out for number one and don't step in number two
New That's yet another a whole can of worms...
Now you start getting into explicit distinctions and exclusion written into the Constitution and how those interact with developments which came much later. Even with that, I don't think there is any doubt the reservations are US dominions.
New the equivelent of states sorta
leaves a gaping hole for law enforcement. State cops cant go there. Tribal cops have to hand felonies over to feds who mostly don't give a shit. Ugly nightmare
always look out for number one and don't step in number two
     Constitutional law professor comments on the Canadian - (malraux) - (11)
         Yup.. [unless QED too..? has been abolished in Newspeak.] -NT - (Ashton)
         Interesting. I'm sure there are good arguments on the other side though. - (Another Scott) - (7)
             But, the Canal Zone was under US jurisdiction at the time.. - (a6l6e6x) - (6)
                 Yup. - (Another Scott)
                 About that military base thingy - (scoenye) - (4)
                     yes and no, Indian Reservations are sovreign, but since 1920 poeple born in them are citizens, sorta -NT - (boxley) - (2)
                         That's yet another a whole can of worms... - (scoenye) - (1)
                             the equivelent of states sorta - (boxley)
                     Panama Canal Zone was more than a military base. - (a6l6e6x)
         Well, we ignored the 12th amendment in 2000, so why does the Constitution matter now? -NT - (mmoffitt)
         well if you are quoting blackstone, he does meet the criteria of being born on english soil :-) - (boxley)

Peanut butter is "dinner" as long as you put it on a plate.
56 ms