Large lecture-based classes are the equivalent of having a textbook read at you. It is passive and a waste of time that could be used better for student to teacher or peer to peer collaboration.
Think of a flipped class as a small seminar class. Everyone is more accountable. Everyone is expected to be prepared and to participate. It is hard to hide. The flip lets you scale the mojo to larger class sizes.
The conclusions reached in the linked article are crap. It is nearly impossible to do a control group experiment. The same faculty member isn't going to develop two courses, one traditional and one flipped. The flipped professor is likely to be younger, more tech savvy and better studied on current pedagogies. The traditional professor is more likely to be a geezer who hasn't updates his syllabus in twenty years.
Flipped classes are also more likely to be honors classes with high performing students.
Think of a flipped class as a small seminar class. Everyone is more accountable. Everyone is expected to be prepared and to participate. It is hard to hide. The flip lets you scale the mojo to larger class sizes.
The conclusions reached in the linked article are crap. It is nearly impossible to do a control group experiment. The same faculty member isn't going to develop two courses, one traditional and one flipped. The flipped professor is likely to be younger, more tech savvy and better studied on current pedagogies. The traditional professor is more likely to be a geezer who hasn't updates his syllabus in twenty years.
Flipped classes are also more likely to be honors classes with high performing students.