No, one has to pay for article.

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #401,627 by a6l6e6x 5/8/15 3:19:45 PM Reply	No, one has to pay for article. Only abstract and references can be seen. Alex "There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that "my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge." -- Isaac Asimov
Post #401,628 by gcareaga 5/8/15 3:52:03 PM Reply	Do as we say, not as we do Typical of the Feds. Thanks for checking.
Post #401,630 by Another Scott 5/8/15 4:15:53 PM Reply	Not quite right. There's no requirement that government-created or government-funded research be published in open-access journals. It would cause lots of problems if that were the case (until the big journals are open-access, anyway). WhiteHouse.gov: That’s why, in a policy memorandum released today, OSTP Director John Holdren has directed Federal agencies with more than $100M in R&D expenditures to develop plans to make the published results of federally funded research freely available to the public within one year of publication and requiring researchers to better account for and manage the digital data resulting from federally funded scientific research. It's not clear that the VA Health System does $100M in R&D each year, so even this it might not apply to them. HTH. Cheers, Scott.

Statins increase risk of diabetes by 87% - (malraux) - (11) - May 8, 2015, 01:44:11 PM EDT

This is my "surprised" face ... want to see it again? -NT - (drook) - May 8, 2015, 02:01:49 PM EDT

Well that's something to keep an eye on ... :-/ -NT - (Another Scott) - May 8, 2015, 02:01:58 PM EDT

VA following the rules? - (gcareaga) - (4) - May 8, 2015, 03:14:30 PM EDT

No, one has to pay for article. - (a6l6e6x) - (2) - May 8, 2015, 03:19:45 PM EDT

Do as we say, not as we do - (gcareaga) - (1) - May 8, 2015, 03:52:03 PM EDT

Not quite right. - (Another Scott) - May 8, 2015, 04:15:53 PM EDT

embargoed for one year -NT - (boxley) - May 8, 2015, 05:41:44 PM EDT

I hate relative risk figures - (pwhysall) - (1) - May 9, 2015, 05:54:44 AM EDT

Yup. They did seem to try to make the groups uniform though. - (Another Scott) - May 9, 2015, 08:21:12 AM EDT

Re: Statins increase risk of diabetes by 87% - (rcareaga) - May 12, 2015, 12:36:04 PM EDT

It looks like someone transcribed a naval weather forecast while woodpeckers hammered their shift keys, then randomly indented it.
64 ms