IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Save yourself the time and effort
Rebuild the thing. It's broken from the core outwards.

You can't put this back together in a reasonable time.

Never install Windows 2000 Server on a FAT partition. Never ever ever. FAT sucks the Pacific through a straw, and there's no reason to use it.


Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
New I thought the reason to use FAT
was for recovery purposes...?

Back when keeping windows running was part of my job, I had an NT install on NTFS go south on me, and I ended up having to purchase a boot diskette that allowed me to copy replacement files to the OS partition... I take it this is no longer necessary? Does 2000 provide the ability to create a boot disk? Is the CD bootable and does it have recovery utilities (that don't simply overwrite the whole disk) now?

I really don't know - On all my machines, I only have 3 windows partitions. 1 is on my main server; laziness is the only reason it's still there, 1 for Everquest - I didn't feel like laying out cash for 2000 just for 1 game, and a 2000 partition on a laptop (running Linux most of the time) - there to support the copy of MS-office that also came on the laptop - so I no longer consider myself an authority about such things...

Imric's Tips for Living
  • Paranoia Is a Survival Trait
  • Pessimists are never disappointed - but sometimes, if they are very lucky, they can be pleasantly surprised...
  • Even though everyone is out to get you, it doesn't matter unless you let them win.
New Windows NT/2000 Server + FAT == Bad Juju
You never need to do that.

If you need to dink around with your installation, you plonk another copy of NT on the box - ideally on a different drive - and then boot that up to do yer doin's. This has the added advantage of allowing you to run with a filesystem that isn't glass-fragile and does actually support security.

Anyone who kept their servers on FAT for "recovery purposes" didn't have a decent recovery plan in place. Hacking around in %SYSTEMROOT%\\Drivers with a DOS boot disk on a production server indicates a lack of forethought and specifically a lack of backups.

The Windows 2000 Server CD is bootable and has a facility called the Recovery Console which allows you to perform maintenance on your installation.


Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
New Dual Boot ext2/fat32
I run my laptop with Win2k and (currently) Debian Sid (PIII-800,256m RAM). I purposely used fat32 with Win2k and ext2 with Linux for interoperablity. It's quite easy to mount fat32 (as vfat) R/W from Linux and ext2 as R/W from Win2K so no matter what OS I'm using, I can still access all my data files (mp3s being the most oft).

This machine isn't a server though, and, of course, YMMV :-)
-----
Steve
New I'll go with that 1/2 way.
NT was an unstable POS. It DID crash, and you advocate having a secondary OS partition, just to replace files on the primary OS partition?

It screwed up about the same amount of the time whether it was on FAT or NTFS, IIRC - I saw no advantage to running the OS on NTFS. Apps, data, that's another story..

I assume, O Professional Shill (*grin*), that since your 'decent recovery plan' seems to include redundant OS partitions on every machine, that you DIDN'T just RRR for what might be a trivial problem (if the OS partition was accessible)? I'm curious about the licensing involved, too - does MS not care about two MS-OS partitions on the same box?

And - don't worry. Back in those days, I was in charge, and I did not like using Windows for any server tasks (we did have some development servers - it was a software house). We used the AS/400 for DB, and OS/2 for file & print...

I've heard about the Recovery Console for 2000, but I don't know what, exactly, it can do - as my laptop hasn't needed it, yet (only 3 OS crashes so far, all fine on reboot).


Imric's Tips for Living
  • Paranoia Is a Survival Trait
  • Pessimists are never disappointed - but sometimes, if they are very lucky, they can be pleasantly surprised...
  • Even though everyone is out to get you, it doesn't matter unless you let them win.
New You need to click that shill link :)


Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
New *grin*

Imric's Tips for Living
  • Paranoia Is a Survival Trait
  • Pessimists are never disappointed - but sometimes, if they are very lucky, they can be pleasantly surprised...
  • Even though everyone is out to get you, it doesn't matter unless you let them win.
     What's going on here? Windows 2000 server - (Andrew Grygus) - (28)
         Maybe a mangled FAT. - (Another Scott)
         Save yourself the time and effort - (pwhysall) - (6)
             I thought the reason to use FAT - (imric) - (5)
                 Windows NT/2000 Server + FAT == Bad Juju - (pwhysall) - (4)
                     Dual Boot ext2/fat32 - (Steve Lowe)
                     I'll go with that 1/2 way. - (imric) - (2)
                         You need to click that shill link :) -NT - (pwhysall) - (1)
                             *grin* -NT - (imric)
         Could it be... that we are talking about - (folkert)
         Well, FAT isn't even part of the problem - (Andrew Grygus) - (18)
             Couple of thoughts - (Silverlock) - (16)
                 Been through that one - (Andrew Grygus) - (15)
                     Yup, it was still in there - in fact . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (14)
                         Every machine? - (Silverlock) - (13)
                             Yup, every single one. - (Andrew Grygus) - (12)
                                 What are you using... - (kmself) - (9)
                                     We use Command . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (8)
                                         Once again, Andrew supplies a new sig. -NT - (Silverlock)
                                         Thanks. I used Symantec's FixKlez.com... - (kmself) - (6)
                                             Any can be vulnerable if . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (5)
                                                 And they call me crazy for *STILL* using OS/2...... -NT - (n3jja) - (4)
                                                     At last count . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (3)
                                                         Interesting.... - (n3jja) - (2)
                                                             Out of curiosity . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
                                                                 Ah... - (n3jja)
                                 How can I tell? - (drewk) - (1)
                                     The only way to tell for sure . . - (Andrew Grygus)
             Can you... - (pwhysall)

Powered by thermodynamics!
76 ms