Naw, that's not it. It's that it would impact folks in their community, and they can't have that now can they.
Re: But - doesn't "no brainer" practically define the current SCOTUS?
Naw, that's not it. It's that it would impact folks in their community, and they can't have that now can they. |
getcher cop hands off my cell phone
- (boxley)
- (4)
- June 25, 2014, 10:31:58 AM EDT
It's really a no brainer, even for SCOTUS.
- (a6l6e6x)
- (3)
- June 25, 2014, 11:58:29 AM EDT
But - doesn't "no brainer" practically define the current SCOTUS?
- (Andrew Grygus)
- (2)
- June 25, 2014, 02:05:59 PM EDT
In that sense, I have to agree. :)
-NT
- (a6l6e6x)
- June 25, 2014, 08:46:05 PM EDT
Re: But - doesn't "no brainer" practically define the current SCOTUS?
- (jake123)
- July 4, 2014, 01:24:43 PM EDT