IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Meh. It mentions Tor.
Tor was a Navy project.

Inception

Tor was originally designed, implemented, and deployed as a third-generation onion routing project of the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory. It was originally developed with the U.S. Navy in mind, for the primary purpose of protecting government communications. Today, it is used every day for a wide variety of purposes by normal people, the military, journalists, law enforcement officers, activists, and many others.

[...]

Staying anonymous

Tor can't solve all anonymity problems. It focuses only on protecting the transport of data. You need to use protocol-specific support software if you don't want the sites you visit to see your identifying information. For example, you can use the Tor Browser Bundle while browsing the web to withhold some information about your computer's configuration.

Also, to protect your anonymity, be smart. Don't provide your name or other revealing information in web forms. Be aware that, like all anonymizing networks that are fast enough for web browsing, Tor does not provide protection against end-to-end timing attacks: If your attacker can watch the traffic coming out of your computer, and also the traffic arriving at your chosen destination, he can use statistical analysis to discover that they are part of the same circuit.


Emphasis added.

Somehow, I don't think that everyone who has done a Google search for Tor is suddenly being spied on by the NSA. YMMV.

We've been through my opinion about the NSA's mission and interest in people like us before. I won't belabor it, but will say that just in an intuitive level, if you're worried about Big Brother seeing what you're doing, then doing it on a network that requires a physical connection over public infrastructure between you and someone else isn't the smartest thing.

One would have thought that people concerned about security and privacy would be aware of the history of anon.penet.fi remailer and similar things in the 1990s.

That said, it's good the EFF and others are pushing for a stronger bill to clarify what the NSA can and cannot do in the US with greater transparency and accountability.

The LJ piece is scaremongering.

FWIW.

Cheers,
Scott.
New Meh back
if you're worried about Big Brother seeing what you're doing, then doing it on a network that requires a physical connection over public infrastructure between you and someone else isn't the smartest thing.


Standard handwaving. As long as you aren't doing anything wrong, shutup. Except depending on who is in charge, nothing wrong today is very wrong tomorrow. That's why we have the concept of privacy, which you don't agree with.
New Reread my next-to-last sentence. Thanks.
New Methinks the gentleman doth [Not-] protest too much
the core-fact that our Brokenness is now thoroughly Institutionalized.
Thus you ignore that de-facto Case that 'Murica' is the broken-version of an America which might once have been repaired--only it wasn't; many predicted it couldn't-be, via by any ordinary processes: all of which had/have been further (and now ~completely) compromised. Concepts were arbitrarily redefined by the actual Governors, those anti-democratic owners of an obscene percentage of the total-of National-everything. (They're bullet-proof: they make the bullets.)

Those of us who are Ashamed to be deemed Muricans-today, and who especially despise suggestions that we pretend one-more-time that "our next vote" can ever reform the corruption laden remnants in which we dwell: probably can unanimously support a Hearty Pshawww to those who deem that Privacy is a fair-bargaining-chip for "the Security of perpetual-warfare" via secret lies and even more-secret funding/control behind the coordinated tissue of those lies.

ie: Your non-response not only begs all the real questions; it dismisses the actuality of '14 Murica: essentially (tacitly) reiterating the mantra.. it's not Broken! just keep on believing that and "voting-in the few, the brave, the Miracle-workers. Who surely-will Fix-it-all, if we just have faith in … … … [What.. ? Unicorns?]
I know! "Just wait for the USSC to die-off and then.." in a few decades..

Oh and: the propositions that BHO was corrupt?/his rhetoric staged-lies or, that he has been incompetent? Have their corollaries:
isn't it amazing that, in the face of unprecedented racism and vicious ad hominem hypocrisy--he managed to win some significant improvements?
(But we still have draconic BHO-approved regs-from-Cheney, in too many places to count. Crap-shoot: again.)

8 years of the Shogunate (OK but just wait..]
~8 years of BHO [the Parade of Brokenness illustrated] in every wasted hour of premeditated Congressional Do-nothingness.]
Or, as Charlie Pierce puts it.

Or: What are the Odds?
People can plan World Cups to a fare-thee-well; use Them for ~similar: for the 21st Cen. Constitutional Convention..
and if that doesn't happen? as Dmitri loved saying: ..well … you. know.


Factoid #1: Never mind the mind-numbing time we imagine is required for Muricans to reach adulthood:
There's a huge scientific consensus. It demands an accelerated time-table of root-level Change.
Wait and ... ... be patient (!) died, I think: when that consensus passed a mere 80%.
Impatience! is Now a Virtue. (I can no longer guess your rationale.. I hope that you can.)
New s/can and cannot/may and may not (legally)/
--

Drew
New Russia offers $110,000 to crack Tor.
http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-28526021

(Only open to Russians, entry fee required.)

Cheers,
Scott.
New Re: entry fee required
Hey, it could be a fund raiser! :)
Alex

"There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that "my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge."”

-- Isaac Asimov
     Hey AS, you ever read a Linux Journal article? - (crazy) - (26)
         So you're telling me ... - (drook) - (1)
             The assumption is - (crazy)
         Meh. It mentions Tor. - (Another Scott) - (6)
             Meh back - (crazy) - (2)
                 Reread my next-to-last sentence. Thanks. -NT - (Another Scott) - (1)
                     Methinks the gentleman doth [Not-] protest too much - (Ashton)
             s/can and cannot/may and may not (legally)/ -NT - (drook)
             Russia offers $110,000 to crack Tor. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                 Re: entry fee required - (a6l6e6x)
         I have the CD archives they've offered... - (folkert) - (3)
             I think they've struggled to attract talent - (pwhysall) - (2)
                 Don't think that would have helped much... - (folkert)
                 Nothing new here - (scoenye)
         Re: Hey AS, you ever read a Linux Journal article? - (Another Scott) - (12)
             so, scaremongering or simply eye opening? -NT - (crazy) - (11)
                 Scaremongering. - (Another Scott) - (10)
                     OK, you win: they are Trustworthy. - (Ashton) - (9)
                         Come now. - (Another Scott) - (8)
                             Well, I start from here: - (Ashton)
                             Re: Come now. for every cop who uses - (boxley) - (6)
                                 Let me know when the NSA puts millions in prison. - (Another Scott) - (5)
                                     I DO know - (crazy) - (4)
                                         Fascinating.. Really! A How-to Manual, redacted-or-not. - (Ashton)
                                         Back to the original Reuters article. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                             As usual, you swallow the party line - (crazy) - (1)
                                                 No need. - (Another Scott)

HELLO MIKE, I CONTACTING YOU ABOUT A CONSULTING OPPORTUNITY AT NIGERIA.
80 ms