do you really think they could build one even if they had access to fissile material?
Left to their own devices ...
do you really think they could build one even if they had access to fissile material? |
|
Re: Left to their own devices ...
The information is readily available. A crude nuke, or even a well-crafted nuke, is certainly within the capability of Texas. I mean, gimme a break. The fucking Pakis have the bomb! fissionably, |
|
Heh
The Pakis (as you so charmingly put it) are a people who, their jihadi enclaves notwithstanding, have a middle class that places almost as much stock in learning as the archetypical Asian Dad ("You get hepatitis B? Why not hepatitis A?" etc). Hell, it seems like every other surgeon and consultant in the NHS hails from Islamabad or Karachi. |
|
I borrowed the term...
(not typically in use on these benighted shores) from Old Blighty. My point being that if Pakistan with its third-world economy and relatively narrow stratum of educated technical personnel can assemble a nuclear weapon from a standing start in just a few decades, then Texas, with existing nuclear materials, a high-level scientific, educational and technological infrastructure, and, I do not doubt, hundreds of scientifically-capable political fuckwits, could cobble together a functional arsenal with just a few turns of a screwdriver within about 72 hours of independence. cordially, |
|
Pakistan had help.
FAS on Pakistan's nuclear weapons: Pakistan's nuclear weapons program was established in 1972 by Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, who founded the program while he was Minister for Fuel, Power and Natural Resources, and later became President and Prime Minister. Shortly after the loss of East Pakistan in the 1971 war with India, Bhutto initiated the program with a meeting of physicists and engineers at Multan in January 1972. Their first claimed nuclear explosion was in May 1998. The DOE has nuclear sites all around the country. Plus, there are the Air Force and Navy sites with nuclear weapons scattered all over. Keeping the technology out of the hands of teabaggers or neo-fascists would be very difficult... Cheers, Scott. |
|
Forget the nukes
Scott Walker now has his own doomsday weapon. http://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/jun/11/crazy-dangerous-creation-deadly-airborne-flu-virus |
|
Seems a predictably-insoluble conundrum.. indefinitely.
If a One, supported by ept-Group, 'decides' it Needs: algorithm-W in order to obviate Horrific-algorithm-X happening on-its-own ... Who ya gonna call? Ghostbusters? I expect that only too-much can be said re ROI, infinitesimal Probabilities and very much linear-thinking + non-linear-Scaring. We don't handle things on this scale well, at all. (Most sci-fi novelettes are about such Ooopses, no?) {sigh} |