the necessity of starting a sentence with [sub] or [sub][sub] and going from there, mindful that (1) + (-1) == (0)
Still, I !=grok why simple [sup] be gone; [sub] isn't 'gone' (along with some semblance of [big], [small]..)
Something like a Style-sheet designed by a Perlmonk on Bolivian Blue-flake, in a blackout as the UPS chirps-out the remaining seconds

Guess it's all a part of Man *nix, where the how-to definitions are compressed and the execution demands
reinventing your [symbol space?] one-line-at-a-time.

Which is fine.. if one is paid by the hour.
(Could this-all be a conspiracy-of-coders: to make damn-sure the nobody in a Suit could crack it?)
Of Course too! ... entirely trivial compared with the bitchin-99%-boffo, eh?

_Carrion..

I jes knowed ya wouldn't go-all-arbitrary on us'ns jes cause ya gots that Root-PW n'stuff.. and could..
mark all our cuss-words, if'n ya wanted ta be Puritan n'such.

(I be all envy at yer 99.99 %Not-typo(e?)s. The little grey cells concur.

;^->