There is no substantive...
...or credible rebuttal to the hypothesis of man-made global warming.
In any body of scientific work there will be elements that are incorrect, inaccurate and badly-done. This does not constitute an overall rebuttal of the hypothesis, even though the scientists in question certainly do need to buck their ideas up and do their jobs properly.
It is long past time to let it go; MMGW is a thing, there are measures we can take to mitigate the worst possible outcomes, and the cool thing is that these measures have a habit of making the world a better place in which to live.
So even if the IPCC is totally wrong, we should still take those measures, because the worst possible outcome is that we have a better place to live.
In any body of scientific work there will be elements that are incorrect, inaccurate and badly-done. This does not constitute an overall rebuttal of the hypothesis, even though the scientists in question certainly do need to buck their ideas up and do their jobs properly.
It is long past time to let it go; MMGW is a thing, there are measures we can take to mitigate the worst possible outcomes, and the cool thing is that these measures have a habit of making the world a better place in which to live.
So even if the IPCC is totally wrong, we should still take those measures, because the worst possible outcome is that we have a better place to live.