while I believe anyone should be able to buy or sell
any type of firearm at all, I dont see a large market for guns that cannot be fired with a cellphone jammer in the area. Self defeating that is.
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 58 years. meep
|
|
|
If you're going up against people with cell phone jammers...
They're probably better armed than you no matter what handgun you've got.
--
Drew |
|
|
I'm with box on this one
|
|
|
Cool! - "Pay up . . .
. . or we'll go for the full $337,000 - plus you'll have substantial lawyer fees if you try to protest this".
|
|
|
Clueless
What does this mean?
|
|
|
It means...
If you don;t pay the paltry sum of $48,000 we are offering you to pay... and pay it now... Well pursue the $337,000 we "could" fine you.
Now hurry up and pay the fine. --
greg@gregfolkert.net "No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible." --Stanislaw Jerzy Lec |
|
|
They should do it with BAN.
Body Area Network. I imagine a cell-phone jammer would find that rather harder to disrupt since it uses the skin as a conductive pathway.
Note I don't know much about the tech, but I have encountered the idea of smart guns like this in speculative fiction several times. Interesting they always use the equivalent of a body area network, such as a contact pad, instead of broadcast technology. Wade. Just Add Story http://justaddstory.wordpress.com/
|
Insane gun fondlers are insane.
- (Another Scott)
- (10)
- May 2, 2014, 09:40:11 PM EDT
(Are people at bus-stops still fully-dressed, lately?)
-NT
- (Ashton)
- May 3, 2014, 05:09:09 AM EDT
while I believe anyone should be able to buy or sell
- (boxley)
- (6)
- May 3, 2014, 07:50:17 PM EDT
If you're going up against people with cell phone jammers...
- (drook)
- (4)
- May 3, 2014, 08:15:36 PM EDT
I'm with box on this one
- (crazy)
- (3)
- May 3, 2014, 09:34:01 PM EDT
Cool! - "Pay up . . .
- (Andrew Grygus)
- (2)
- May 3, 2014, 10:09:44 PM EDT
Clueless
- (crazy)
- (1)
- May 4, 2014, 07:58:05 AM EDT
It means...
- (folkert)
- May 4, 2014, 10:30:39 AM EDT
They should do it with BAN.
- (static)
- May 5, 2014, 02:58:25 AM EDT
Sendup of NRA Convention, 'NRA Hypnosis'
- (Ashton)
- (1)
- May 4, 2014, 04:24:36 AM EDT
Yup. :-(
-NT
- (Another Scott)
- May 4, 2014, 08:05:27 AM EDT
