I wonder who's funding this one

Post #383,903 by drook 11/29/13 11:12:18 AM Reply	I wonder who's funding this one I saw the video this thread is discussing this morning. Obviously a lot of money behind it. I wonder whose money. http://www.godlikepr...essage2418080/pg1 -- Drew
Post #383,904 by folkert 11/29/13 11:42:54 AM Reply	I wonder why the Ratings are disabled on the YT video... Yeah. We all know and it is apparent. -- greg@gregfolkert.net "No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible." --Stanislaw Jerzy Lec
Post #383,905 by boxley 11/29/13 11:56:36 AM Reply	is there some lies involved there? Other than the beginning one about the shah the rest is very accurate. The conclusions may be erroneous Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 58 years. meep
Post #383,906 by hnick 11/29/13 12:13:17 PM Reply	Hard to say. Loonies abound. Some centuries ago, William of Occam, suggested that unprovable entities should not be multiplied. Now, public relations suggests that multiplying possible hypothetical situations indicates a clear and immediate danger that must be addressed as forcefully as taxpayers can funnel money to the war industry. Raytheon? Israel? a plethora of oil companies? As a country, we can have people be out of work for the rest of their lives, but we emphatically can not be out of war for more than a few weeks a most.
Post #383,913 by boxley 11/29/13 1:19:06 PM Reply	you left out house of Saud Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 58 years. meep
Post #383,914 by hnick 11/29/13 6:02:23 PM Reply	True, that.
Post #383,916 by Another Scott 11/29/13 8:22:40 PM Reply	Some digging by someone on Kos... http://www.dailykos....e-hate-Iran-Facts As you can see, the Clarion Project seems to be connecting itself to this video via this page here. But I hadn't heard of The Clarion Project before so I did a little more digging, stopping first at Wikipedia: FWIW. Cheers, Scott.
Post #383,917 by boxley 11/29/13 8:41:29 PM Reply	major nit with the links It also, of course, completely ignores the principal reason for Iranian anger toward America: the 1953 CIA-sponsored overthrow of Mohammad Mosaddegh and (re)installation of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi as the Shah of Iran Sorry folks that was a Brit action and the most amusing part of it was the use of Mullahs to engineer it. For many years in that part of the world, the standard refrain was "If you want to know what the British are up to ask the Mullahs." Now we the US inherited Iran and the Shah as a useful crony and propped him up until he fell. No question but the original opp was British all the way, they owned that part of the world at that time. Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 58 years. meep
Post #383,967 by altmann 12/2/13 3:42:19 PM Reply	It was a joint op The CIA has even admitted their involvement in the coup.
Post #383,994 by a6l6e6x 12/3/13 7:52:18 PM Reply	AIPAC? They have all the money they need for this! Israelis can't have a rapprochement between Iran and US, especially if they plan an attack. But, they're being stupid. In 2003, Iran approached the United States with an offer to talk about its nuclear program. The George W. Bush administration rejected the offer because it believed that the Iranian regime was weak, had been battered by sanctions, and would either capitulate or collapse if Washington just stayed tough. So there was no deal. What was the result? Iran had 164 centrifuges operating in 2003; today it has 19,000 centrifuges. Link: http://globalpublics...ut-the-iran-deal/ Alex

Welcome to IWETHEY!