Post #382,290
10/17/13 10:42:48 AM
|

pop quiz, name the last republican I voted for
and the last democrat in the presidential elections? The teabagger lives in Michigan and posts in half caps all the time.
3) I noticed that it was all about tax credits, not insurance for everybody how stupid are you,? Obama care doesnt provide Insurance for anybody, it gives you a tax credit if you buy and you qualify or it forces you to pay an additional tax for not buying.
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 58 years. meep
|
Post #382,295
10/17/13 12:21:19 PM
|

Medicaid expansion is a nothingburger?
|
Post #382,298
10/17/13 3:43:35 PM
|

foodstamp expansion is a nothingburger?
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 58 years. meep
|
Post #382,299
10/17/13 3:44:21 PM
|

unemplyment insurance extentions is a nothingburger?
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 58 years. meep
|
Post #382,301
10/17/13 3:57:13 PM
|

Re: unemplyment insurance extentions is a nothingburger?
?
Obama care doesnt provide Insurance for anybody, it gives you a tax credit if you buy and you qualify or it forces you to pay an additional tax for not buying.
Medicare expansion, a big part of Obamacare, is direct insurance from the government. I think that contradicts your statement.
I'm not sure what you're getting at with your replies.
More words please.
Cheers,
Scott.
|
Post #382,305
10/17/13 4:42:24 PM
|

medicare expansion
is a very small part of the tax credits, extra taxes imposed on the financial bill that is obamacare and if you look at the bottom of any Doctors responsibility for payment form it asks the question
Do you have Insurance, Medicare, or Medicaid?
So its not quite the same as.
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 58 years. meep
|
Post #382,306
10/17/13 4:52:37 PM
|

We seem to be talking past each other.
Bush's "health care" proposal was smoke and mirrors and magic asterisks to throw big tax deductions at favored people. The WaPo piece shows that it would have done very little to actually insure people.
Yes, Obamacare has changes to the tax code. And horror of horrors, it actually pays for itself by collecting some taxes and reducing some overpayments.
The point remains, though, that Bush's proposal wasn't comprehensive and didn't cover as many people as anything that claims to be a quasi-universal health insurance scheme would do.
HTH.
Cheers,
Scott.
|
Post #382,308
10/17/13 5:03:55 PM
|

Re: We seem to be talking past each other.
think that wapo piece is heavily biased and that you would consider any republican legislation of that time to be " smoke and mirrors and magic asterisks to throw big tax deductions at favored people"
Since all of the deductions and credits were aimed at those making less than 60k per year, apparently that left too many rich people who were making almost 60k a year for your taste buds. YMMV
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 58 years. meep
|
Post #382,326
10/18/13 3:38:39 AM
|

Debunked by Drew above, at 17:58:59 yesterday.
So, how stupid are YOU?
(Judging from how you refuse to stop being a UI for your owners even after being alerted to this being what you are doing, quite a bit.)
--
Christian R. Conrad
Same old username (as above), but now on iki.fi
(Yeah, yeah, it redirects to the same old GMail... But just in case I ever want to change.)
|
Post #382,337
10/18/13 12:47:24 PM
|

hardly, asked and answered
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 58 years. meep
|
Post #382,341
10/18/13 2:05:10 PM
|

Hardly what? And what was asked and answered?
You mean how Droo answered your stupid "Isn't Obamacare all about tax credits too?", or what? Yeah, that hardly makes you less of an UI... What, wasn't that what you meant by "hardly"? If not, then what?
It's one thing brevity being the soul of whit, and all that, but there can be too much of a good thing. Ever more terseness doesn't make your scibblings ever more witty; after a certain point they just become unintelligible.
--
Christian R. Conrad
Same old username (as above), but now on iki.fi
(Yeah, yeah, it redirects to the same old GMail... But just in case I ever want to change.)
|
Post #382,345
10/18/13 3:24:35 PM
|

s /whit/wit
Cheers,
Scott.
(Who never imagined he'd be able to correct CRC on his English!!)
|
Post #382,351
10/18/13 3:48:40 PM
|

Ever more whitty... Were the H did that come from?!?!?!?!?!?
|
Post #382,354
10/18/13 3:50:53 PM
|

+1!!!
--
greg@gregfolkert.net
"No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible." --Stanislaw Jerzy Lec
|
Post #382,349
10/18/13 3:41:11 PM
|

Perhaps they're not meant to be 'understood'..
..merely reviled?
(Umm masochists often do skits like that; ... 'ya suppose? Nahh--they at least enjoy bein whupped around.)
|
Post #382,350
10/18/13 3:42:17 PM
|

he didnt answer, he asked a question, the answer was yes
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 58 years. meep
|
Post #382,355
10/18/13 3:59:07 PM
|

Ah, OK: Drew put his debunking in the shape of a question --
-- a purely rhetorical "question" -- and you answered in the affirmative; i.e, ADMITTED THAT HIS DEBUNKING WAS CORRECT. SO WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU DOING, trying the same scam again all over with me, if you then go (ever so cryptically) bragging about how you've already been debunked?!?
Did you really think "Hey, but can you answer this? And by the way, he already did!" would actually *support* your "this" (whateverthefuck it was again; who cares, any more...)?!? Because if you did, you really need to take a course or three in Remedial Kindergarten Logic, 'coz it seems you just flunked that with bells on.
--
Christian R. Conrad
Same old username (as above), but now on iki.fi
(Yeah, yeah, it redirects to the same old GMail... But just in case I ever want to change.)
|