It was a long process with may facets.

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #381,563 by Another Scott 10/3/13 10:10:41 AM Reply	It was a long process with may facets. In committee, early on the Democrats were watering things down to try to get a few Rs on board. Eventually, once they had enough support, they stopped making changes to make sure it would pass. That's one reason why startup was delayed so long, I think. The uniform Republican opposition came later. That's my recollection, anyway. Cheers, Scott.
Post #381,572 by boxley 10/3/13 3:06:15 PM Reply	thanks Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 58 years. meep

House of Turds - (gcareaga) - (36) - Oct. 1, 2013, 05:07:20 PM EDT

Poifect! -NT - (folkert) - Oct. 1, 2013, 06:12:57 PM EDT

Welcome aboard! -NT - (Another Scott) - Oct. 1, 2013, 06:38:57 PM EDT

Ed Kilgore channels imaginary fierce BHO - (rcareaga) - (32) - Oct. 2, 2013, 11:16:24 AM EDT

I'm arguing with a Tea Bagger on Facebook... - (folkert) - (31) - Oct. 2, 2013, 03:41:48 PM EDT

Long drawn-out non-answers in opposition to the ACA?!? - (CRConrad) - Oct. 2, 2013, 04:49:28 PM EDT

ACA absolutely is the law. USSC said so - (boxley) - (25) - Oct. 2, 2013, 09:09:02 PM EDT

Missed one - (drook) - (15) - Oct. 2, 2013, 09:54:08 PM EDT

do you have any links that show there was any - (boxley) - (14) - Oct. 2, 2013, 10:17:41 PM EDT

The Republicans added all kinds of stuff to the ACA. - (Another Scott) - (11) - Oct. 2, 2013, 10:50:47 PM EDT

thanks for the links. - (boxley) - (10) - Oct. 2, 2013, 11:16:52 PM EDT

At that point, the heavy lifting was done in the Senate. - (Another Scott) - (9) - Oct. 3, 2013, 05:49:28 AM EDT

wasnt trying to go there - (boxley) - (7) - Oct. 3, 2013, 10:04:52 AM EDT

It was a long process with may facets. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Oct. 3, 2013, 10:10:41 AM EDT

thanks -NT - (boxley) - Oct. 3, 2013, 03:06:15 PM EDT

So, why can't it be thir fault both ways? - (CRConrad) - (4) - Oct. 9, 2013, 09:23:01 AM EDT

" they forced it to be watered-down as all Hell" - (boxley) - (2) - Oct. 9, 2013, 10:30:34 AM EDT

It's spelled F-I-L-I-B-U-S-T-E-R -NT - (drook) - (1) - Oct. 9, 2013, 10:56:19 AM EDT

no It's spelled c-h-i-c-k-e-n-s-h-i-t - (boxley) - Oct. 9, 2013, 11:18:53 AM EDT

+6.66: minimalist Definition of, 'to be a Repo 2013' -NT - (Ashton) - Oct. 9, 2013, 06:02:33 PM EDT

Pelosi did let the most influential Republican amend it. - (mmoffitt) - Oct. 3, 2013, 12:54:14 PM EDT

Couldn't have been "all Democratic" - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Oct. 3, 2013, 08:40:48 AM EDT

I fear that.. - (Ashton) - Oct. 4, 2013, 12:01:28 AM EDT

You should just go with universal healthcare - (pwhysall) - (8) - Oct. 3, 2013, 06:53:58 AM EDT

Well duh -NT - (drook) - Oct. 3, 2013, 07:05:44 AM EDT

Most of us know that. - (mmoffitt) - Oct. 3, 2013, 08:42:47 AM EDT

yup another 2% on the payroll tax would be close to covering -NT - (boxley) - (5) - Oct. 3, 2013, 10:07:05 AM EDT

Which part of "costs less" did you miss? -NT - (pwhysall) - (4) - Oct. 3, 2013, 12:33:37 PM EDT

That would still be less for us. - (mmoffitt) - Oct. 3, 2013, 12:51:59 PM EDT

we dont have the cash unless we raise some - (boxley) - (2) - Oct. 3, 2013, 03:12:38 PM EDT

Raising the FICA limit slowly would do it. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Oct. 3, 2013, 03:22:16 PM EDT

that would work as well -NT - (boxley) - Oct. 3, 2013, 03:29:25 PM EDT

Not arguing anymore with a Tea Bagger on Facebook... - (folkert) - (3) - Oct. 4, 2013, 12:10:31 PM EDT

Life's too short. Enjoy the reduced aggravation. -NT - (Another Scott) - (2) - Oct. 4, 2013, 12:27:32 PM EDT

I can't imagine his... - (folkert) - (1) - Oct. 4, 2013, 01:06:21 PM EDT

there is a calvin toon that covers that -NT - (boxley) - Oct. 4, 2013, 04:12:12 PM EDT

Re: House of Turds - (lincoln) - Oct. 2, 2013, 01:55:11 PM EDT

The LRPDs come from within, not without.
57 ms