IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New wasnt trying to go there
my impression was that the repos obstructed the bill all the way to the bitter end but now if anyone brings up that obamacare sux a chorus of "its the republicans fault" springs up
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 58 years. meep
New It was a long process with may facets.
In committee, early on the Democrats were watering things down to try to get a few Rs on board. Eventually, once they had enough support, they stopped making changes to make sure it would pass.

That's one reason why startup was delayed so long, I think.

The uniform Republican opposition came later.

That's my recollection, anyway.

Cheers,
Scott.
New thanks
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 58 years. meep
New So, why can't it be thir fault both ways?
The BOx scribbles:
[M]y impression was that the repos obstructed the bill all the way to the bitter end but now if anyone brings up that obamacare sux a chorus of "its the republicans fault" springs up[.]
So what?

Yes, they obstructed it "to the bitter end"(*), so it's their fault that it came late.

AND they forced it to be watered-down as all Hell in order to squeeze through despite their obstructionism, so it's their fault that it "sux" in the sense of not covering all the things that it should.

Why should it only be their fault one way or the other, when they set out to fuck it up any way they could? If it's slightly fucked-up in more ways than one, ALL those ways can logically be the fault of these too-successful fucker-uppers.

(That seems to be all the Republicans are good for, by the way: Fucking stuff up.)


---
(*): And are now in the process of obstructing for obstructionism's own sake; far, far beyond any reasonable definition of "the end", be that "bitter" or sweet.
--
Christian R. Conrad
Same old username (as above), but now on iki.fi

(Yeah, yeah, it redirects to the same old GMail... But just in case I ever want to change.)
New " they forced it to be watered-down as all Hell"
the democratic party had sizable majorities and owned the white house, explain how this "forced" thing works will you?
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 58 years. meep
New It's spelled F-I-L-I-B-U-S-T-E-R
--

Drew
New no It's spelled c-h-i-c-k-e-n-s-h-i-t
Reid could have ended debate at any time under senate rules. He has done so twice since for less reason
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 58 years. meep
New +6.66: minimalist Definition of, 'to be a Repo 2013'
     House of Turds - (gcareaga) - (36)
         Poifect! -NT - (folkert)
         Welcome aboard! -NT - (Another Scott)
         Ed Kilgore channels imaginary fierce BHO - (rcareaga) - (32)
             I'm arguing with a Tea Bagger on Facebook... - (folkert) - (31)
                 Long drawn-out non-answers in opposition to the ACA?!? - (CRConrad)
                 ACA absolutely is the law. USSC said so - (boxley) - (25)
                     Missed one - (drook) - (15)
                         do you have any links that show there was any - (boxley) - (14)
                             The Republicans added all kinds of stuff to the ACA. - (Another Scott) - (11)
                                 thanks for the links. - (boxley) - (10)
                                     At that point, the heavy lifting was done in the Senate. - (Another Scott) - (9)
                                         wasnt trying to go there - (boxley) - (7)
                                             It was a long process with may facets. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                                 thanks -NT - (boxley)
                                             So, why can't it be thir fault both ways? - (CRConrad) - (4)
                                                 " they forced it to be watered-down as all Hell" - (boxley) - (2)
                                                     It's spelled F-I-L-I-B-U-S-T-E-R -NT - (drook) - (1)
                                                         no It's spelled c-h-i-c-k-e-n-s-h-i-t - (boxley)
                                                 +6.66: minimalist Definition of, 'to be a Repo 2013' -NT - (Ashton)
                                         Pelosi did let the most influential Republican amend it. - (mmoffitt)
                             Couldn't have been "all Democratic" - (mmoffitt) - (1)
                                 I fear that.. - (Ashton)
                     You should just go with universal healthcare - (pwhysall) - (8)
                         Well duh -NT - (drook)
                         Most of us know that. - (mmoffitt)
                         yup another 2% on the payroll tax would be close to covering -NT - (boxley) - (5)
                             Which part of "costs less" did you miss? -NT - (pwhysall) - (4)
                                 That would still be less for us. - (mmoffitt)
                                 we dont have the cash unless we raise some - (boxley) - (2)
                                     Raising the FICA limit slowly would do it. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                         that would work as well -NT - (boxley)
                 Not arguing anymore with a Tea Bagger on Facebook... - (folkert) - (3)
                     Life's too short. Enjoy the reduced aggravation. -NT - (Another Scott) - (2)
                         I can't imagine his... - (folkert) - (1)
                             there is a calvin toon that covers that -NT - (boxley)
         Re: House of Turds - (lincoln)

Only a Stephen Hawking vs. Larry Flynt joust could compare in terms of universal significance.
59 ms