IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Industry bias
I've seen discussion on this thread about the bias of Big Pharma. It exists, but is significantly greater for studies about primary CVD than secondary CVD.

http://www.ncbi.nlm....v/pubmed/23861972

New Not how I'd interpret that
Both groups -- primary and secondary CV prevention -- had 0% negative outcomes reported on sponsored studies. When one side of a ratio is zero you can't really say this one is zero-er than that one.
--

Drew
New Lovely: if we think 1/0 is Hard? Try 0/0. With-feeling. ;^>
     Statins? - (rcareaga) - (21)
         My father was on them for a while. - (Another Scott)
         Why would you take them? - (drook) - (3)
             mitochondrial damage, hmmm - (rcareaga)
             Yes, the whole cholesterol heart attack theory . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
                 David Gillespie thinks so, too. - (static)
         Re: Statins? - (pwhysall) - (1)
             Neat source ... quote from one of those links - (drook)
         Have something maybe relevant at USPS now.. - (Ashton) - (1)
             Material is condescendingly didactic, thus far - (Ashton)
         my wife takes whatever the docs throw at her - (boxley)
         Sibs (3) are united in urging statins - (rcareaga) - (4)
             Oatmeal is good and quick in the morning. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                 That would have been my suggestion as well. - (a6l6e6x) - (1)
                     Beware the yoghurt, unfortunately. - (static)
             urge you to look at the arteries - (boxley)
         Good timing - (drook)
         Industry bias - (gcareaga) - (2)
             Not how I'd interpret that - (drook) - (1)
                 Lovely: if we think 1/0 is Hard? Try 0/0. With-feeling. ;^> -NT - (Ashton)
         Hate 'em - (crazy) - (1)
             Inflammation. - (Andrew Grygus)

Please engage brain before pressing keys and clicking mouse.
80 ms