IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Re: Interesting.
Was thinking the same thing. I wonder how much the mass needed for landing fuel compares to the extra mass of lugging around aerodynamic surfaces on the Shuttle compares.
New Still think they should do ballistic drop crew capsules
Simplest technology, fewest moving parts, lightest weight. The only reason for something like the shuttle is if you plan to bring back large objects. The only things big enough to need the shuttle, and valuable enough to warrant the expense, are not in LEO, and thus not available to the shuttle.

I'm struggling to see the benefit of this project. It's a great technology demonstrator, but what's the use case?
--

Drew
New Reuses more of the vehicle
As long as the extra fuel is cheaper than the sum of the parts that are recovered, it's economically viable.
Regards,
-scott
Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
New That's a big "if"
It's not just the fuel for the landing, it's the extra fuel to get the landing fuel up there to begin with. And the extra weight of the tank for that extra fuel. And the extra fuel for the weight of the larger tank. etc. etc. etc. Weight is a problem that compounds quickly.

Sure, there can be a point where the lines cross, and this demo sets some parameters for drawing those lines.
--

Drew
New Presumably they've done the calculations
And arrived at a number they can live with.
Regards,
-scott
Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
New Depends on the question you ask though, doesn't it?
Which leads to my opinion on the shuttle. They wanted a reusable craft, then came up with the justification afterwards.
--

Drew
New But honestly...
That is how the whole space thing started isn't it?
--
greg@gregfolkert.net
PGP key 1024D/B524687C 2003-08-05
Fingerprint: E1D3 E3D7 5850 957E FED0 2B3A ED66 6971 B524 687C
New Different thing...
Shuttle: designed by committee to be excellent at nothing.

SpaceX is a business.
Regards,
-scott
Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
     Elon Musk's 'Grasshopper' rocket: hovers, lands back on pad. - (Ashton) - (12)
         Wow. Just. Wow! -NT - (mmoffitt)
         Now that's control! -NT - (a6l6e6x)
         Interesting. - (Another Scott) - (9)
             Re: Interesting. - (altmann) - (7)
                 Still think they should do ballistic drop crew capsules - (drook) - (6)
                     Reuses more of the vehicle - (malraux) - (5)
                         That's a big "if" - (drook) - (4)
                             Presumably they've done the calculations - (malraux) - (3)
                                 Depends on the question you ask though, doesn't it? - (drook) - (2)
                                     But honestly... - (folkert)
                                     Different thing... - (malraux)
             Good Wikipedia pages on reusable rockets. - (Another Scott)

I just know what I read in the magazines.
66 ms