RFC - (Brandioch) - (11) - May 3, 2002, 04:32:45 PM EDT
         If you get #4, why do you need #3? -NT - (Silverlock) - (1) - May 3, 2002, 04:36:19 PM EDT
             You don't have to pay MS for upgrades ... - (altmann) - May 3, 2002, 04:45:44 PM EDT
         Well, there already is an open file format - (tonytib) - (7) - May 3, 2002, 07:52:24 PM EDT
             Sounds good. I'll check into it. - (Brandioch) - (6) - May 3, 2002, 08:01:46 PM EDT
                 I can believe in OO and GPL - (tonytib) - (5) - May 3, 2002, 08:26:26 PM EDT
                     I'd like to see a different approach. - (Brandioch) - (4) - May 3, 2002, 09:42:39 PM EDT
                         I still think that might happen with OO file format - (tonytib) - (3) - May 6, 2002, 01:09:12 PM EDT
                             I wuz lookin' - (imric) - May 6, 2002, 03:29:41 PM EDT
                             Not our courts. - (Brandioch) - (1) - May 6, 2002, 10:04:48 PM EDT
                                 Yes, it would be great if that happened; maybe ECMA for stds -NT - (tonytib) - May 7, 2002, 01:25:04 PM EDT
         Wasn't SGML once such a document standard? - (a6l6e6x) - May 3, 2002, 10:01:16 PM EDT