If you get #4, why do you need #3?

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #37,374 by Silverlock 5/3/02 4:36:19 PM Reply	If you get #4, why do you need #3? Don't blame me. I voted with the majority.
Post #37,375 by altmann 5/3/02 4:45:44 PM Reply	You don't have to pay MS for upgrades ... ... if you can retrofit your existing Office software to read/write the new format using a 3rd party tool. -- Chris Altmann

RFC - (Brandioch) - (11) - May 3, 2002, 04:32:45 PM EDT

If you get #4, why do you need #3? -NT - (Silverlock) - (1) - May 3, 2002, 04:36:19 PM EDT

You don't have to pay MS for upgrades ... - (altmann) - May 3, 2002, 04:45:44 PM EDT

Well, there already is an open file format - (tonytib) - (7) - May 3, 2002, 07:52:24 PM EDT

Sounds good. I'll check into it. - (Brandioch) - (6) - May 3, 2002, 08:01:46 PM EDT

I can believe in OO and GPL - (tonytib) - (5) - May 3, 2002, 08:26:26 PM EDT

I'd like to see a different approach. - (Brandioch) - (4) - May 3, 2002, 09:42:39 PM EDT

I still think that might happen with OO file format - (tonytib) - (3) - May 6, 2002, 01:09:12 PM EDT

I wuz lookin' - (imric) - May 6, 2002, 03:29:41 PM EDT

Not our courts. - (Brandioch) - (1) - May 6, 2002, 10:04:48 PM EDT

Yes, it would be great if that happened; maybe ECMA for stds -NT - (tonytib) - May 7, 2002, 01:25:04 PM EDT

Wasn't SGML once such a document standard? - (a6l6e6x) - May 3, 2002, 10:01:16 PM EDT

Your Spork God[tm] was HERE!
65 ms