Horoscopes

Post #37,073 by kmself 5/1/02 2:06:00 PM Reply	Horoscopes No, I don't believe in astrology. Still, I'll read the odd horoscope. Not because I believe in it. But because these are interestingly written, generic bits of advice/input, which can be broadly interpreted (that's why they work). So if I read them, I read all of 'em. Brezney's Real Astrology is a good one. Same way I'll read the Grab Bag, trivia, sports, or much of what's printed on this virtual fishwrap. Point: reading horoscope != believe in astrology. `-- Karsten M. Self [link\|mailto:kmself@ix.netcom.com\|kmself@ix.netcom.com] [link\|http://kmself.home.netcom.com/\|[link\|http://kmself.home.netcom.com/\|http://kmself.home.netcom.com/]] What part of "gestalt" don't you understand? Keep software free. Oppose the CBDTPA. Kill S.2048 dead. [link\|http://www.eff.org/alerts/20020322_eff_cbdtpa_alert.html\|[link\|http://www.eff.org/alerts/20020322_eff_cbdtpa_alert.html\|http://www.eff.org/...a_alert.html]]`
Post #37,125 by Brandioch 5/1/02 7:30:59 PM Reply	Read the right horoscopes. [link\|http://www.freewillastrology.com/pages/allsigns.shtml\|Here]
Post #37,126 by Meerkat 5/1/02 7:51:58 PM Reply	I've sometims had great fun... ..reading out the astrology page of a newspaper to a believer, who then went "Wow, that's so true!" ... except of course to this Taurus I read out the Aquarian horoscope... I can't remember where I read it, but I believe a teacher once handed out an astrology passage to every student, suitably marked to their star sign. All the students went "ooh... true ... spooky". The teacher then asked the students to pass their piece of paper on to the person next to them - which is when the students found out that every single passage was the same. Reminds me of a good book I read recently "Did Adam and Eve have Navels?" which I should probably do a review on or something. On and on and on and on, and on and on and on goes John.
Post #37,146 by kmself 5/1/02 10:06:55 PM Reply	Class experiment The classic is "a personal profile". The clincher. Even after seeing their neighbors' profiles, a significant fraction of the group usually still believes the description was personally addressed to them. The epigram I've seen recently, to the effect of: you cannot convince by logic beliefs based in faith. Too right. `-- Karsten M. Self [link\|mailto:kmself@ix.netcom.com\|kmself@ix.netcom.com] [link\|http://kmself.home.netcom.com/\|[link\|http://kmself.home.netcom.com/\|http://kmself.home.netcom.com/]] What part of "gestalt" don't you understand? Keep software free. Oppose the CBDTPA. Kill S.2048 dead. [link\|http://www.eff.org/alerts/20020322_eff_cbdtpa_alert.html\|[link\|http://www.eff.org/alerts/20020322_eff_cbdtpa_alert.html\|http://www.eff.org/...a_alert.html]]`
Post #37,172 by Ashton 5/2/02 5:36:02 AM Reply	Heh.. toy 'astrology' that - As Sai Baba said, "Astrology good science. No good Astrologers." [now] But agreement - the level of BS in these general daily horoscopes is - National Enquirer grade! (The silliest parts are always about 'predictions') {sigh} That it should be this way - is hardly surprising, either. BS is our most important daily product, no? Ashton

Welcome to IWETHEY!