fully agree
So several mass murders that add up 374 deaths in 2011 means all rights for 300 million americans should be abridged because hammers? your math is weak
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 57 years. meep
|
|
Re: fully agree
So several mass murders that add up 374 deaths in 2011 means all rights for 300 million americans should be abridged because hammers? your math is weak "All rights"? Hyperbolie much? Even the Roberts court said that gun rights could be regulated. HTH. Cheers, Scott. |
|
|
im not the one howling for assault weapons ban
think the hyperbole is on your side on this one. 374 deaths cause an outright ban on an object?
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 57 years. meep
|
|
|
Why not?
Was the Constitution destroyed in 1994 and magically resurrected in 2004?
http://en.wikipedia....sault_Weapons_Ban Not too many people were killed by privately owned M1A1 tanks, but it's illegal to have one with operational weapons. Cheers, Scott. |
|
|
shrug, neither one of us can change the others mind
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 57 years. meep
|
|
|
We haven't in 10+ years. ;-)
|
why are we banning rifles again?
- (boxley)
- (19)
- Jan. 3, 2013, 03:22:52 PM EST
Hard to do mass murder with hammers. HTH.
-NT
- (Another Scott)
- (6)
- Jan. 5, 2013, 08:57:43 AM EST
fully agree
- (boxley)
- (5)
- Jan. 5, 2013, 11:13:37 AM EST
Re: fully agree
- (Another Scott)
- (4)
- Jan. 5, 2013, 11:55:15 AM EST
im not the one howling for assault weapons ban
- (boxley)
- (3)
- Jan. 5, 2013, 12:19:17 PM EST
Why not?
- (Another Scott)
- (2)
- Jan. 5, 2013, 12:40:13 PM EST
shrug, neither one of us can change the others mind
-NT
- (boxley)
- (1)
- Jan. 5, 2013, 05:16:19 PM EST
We haven't in 10+ years. ;-)
-NT
- (Another Scott)
- Jan. 5, 2013, 06:09:59 PM EST
PZ's take.
- (Another Scott)
- (11)
- Jan. 6, 2013, 06:51:32 PM EST
Another way to put that, in a comment
- (drook)
- (6)
- Jan. 6, 2013, 08:37:18 PM EST
They require skills, and strength and training
- (crazy)
- (5)
- Jan. 7, 2013, 05:35:18 AM EST
Years...
- (S1mon_Jester)
- Jan. 7, 2013, 06:26:11 AM EST
Yes, and ... ?
- (drook)
- (1)
- Jan. 7, 2013, 07:12:28 AM EST
Wasn't casting comment on them
- (crazy)
- Jan. 7, 2013, 08:00:49 AM EST
If guns are equalizers...
- (pwhysall)
- (1)
- Jan. 7, 2013, 07:35:21 AM EST
Oooooohhhhh ... I see what you did there :-D
-NT
- (drook)
- Jan. 7, 2013, 07:40:43 AM EST
they are going after the rifles, not the
- (boxley)
- (3)
- Jan. 6, 2013, 08:40:31 PM EST
Don't be so sure.
- (Another Scott)
- (2)
- Jan. 6, 2013, 09:03:50 PM EST
ROFL!
- (boxley)
- Jan. 6, 2013, 11:20:47 PM EST
Unnacceptable
- (crazy)
- Jan. 7, 2013, 05:41:51 AM EST