When it came out that CIA Director David Petraeus had an affair with his hagiographer, I got punked. ÂIt seems so obvious in retrospect. How could you @attackerman? tweeted @bitteranagram, complete with a link to a florid piece I wrote for this blog when Petraeus retired from the Army last year. (ÂThe gold standard for wartime command is one of the harsher judgments in the piece.) I was so blind to Petraeus, and my role in the mythmaking that surrounded his career, that I initially missed @bitteranagramÂs joke.
But itÂs a good burn. Like many in the press, nearly every national politician, and lots of members of Petraeus brain trust over the years, I played a role in the creation of the legend around David Petraeus. Yes, Paula Broadwell wrote the ultimate Petraeus hagiography, the now-unfortunately titled All In. But she was hardly alone. (Except maybe for the sleeping-with-Petraeus part.) The biggest irony surrounding Petraeus unexpected downfall is that he became a casualty of the very publicity machine he cultivated to portray him as superhuman. I have some insight into how that machine worked.
[...]
A good read.
He doesn't mention Petraeus attempting to undercut Obama early in his administration with things like this, from February 2009 - http://www.atimes.co...ast/KB11Ak01.html
WASHINGTON - The political maneuvering between United States President Barack Obama and his top field commanders over withdrawal from Iraq has taken a sudden new turn with the leak by Central Command chief General David Petraeus - and a firm denial by a White House official - of an account of the January 21 White House meeting suggesting that Obama had requested three different combat troop withdrawal plans with their respective associated risks, including one of 23 months.
The Petraeus account, reported by McClatchy newspapers on February 5 and then by the Associated Press the following day, appears to indicate that Obama is moving away from the 16-month plan he had vowed during the campaign to implement if elected. But on closer examination, it doesn't necessarily refer to any action by Obama or to anything that happened at the January 21 meeting.
The real story of the leak by Petraeus is that the most powerful figure in the US military has tried to shape the media coverage of Obama and combat troop withdrawal from Iraq to advance his policy agenda - and, very likely, his personal political interests as well.
[...]
Petraeus was brilliant but he was a dangerous man because he thought too highly of himself.
Hubris, fortunately, claimed him before he could do more damage.
Expect efforts to rehabilitate him in the public eye, though.
My $0.02.
Cheers,
Scott.