Pot, Kettle, and Black.
What truly amazes me is that you yourself have jumped onto others for jumping to conclusions without facts. You don't know if the test was rigged or not, but you willing to judge the reporter. You've said that the test was hard, even with GPS, without facts.
If you'll note - the jumping exercise here (and I'm sure you won't) was you.
And yes, its hard, GPS or no GPS. I *know* this. We can debate my knowledge level about that, but hitting 2 targets, moving at those speeds, with the variances to be expected, yeah, that's hard.
I'll accept that as a fact. If you want to think its easy, well, go ahead, but your opposition to the ABM program will look silly if you think its easy, and we shouldn't do it. :)
Do the math for yourself if you don't believe me. I won't be insulted. But its hard.
But then again, I'm not ready to jump to conclusions about the test as we don't know.
You already *did*. So did the reporter. And its my supposition that the reporter did exactly that, for much the same reason you did.
I'm certainly not going to judge the reporter and claim "he doesn't get it" until those facts are out
Note that I'm just mentioning that as a possibility. In response to your (implications) that the military isn't honest about its systems.
I guess your rules just don't apply to you.
Right.
Sorry. Forgot, anti-Republican good good good, pro-republican bad.
And me forgot to bash bash bash.
No happen again.
Addison
