Another linguistic annoyance - (drewk) - (13) - April 23, 2002, 02:52:45 PM EDT
         Yeah, but irregardless of that...how do you REALLY feel? ;-\ufffd -NT - (jb4) - (1) - April 23, 2002, 05:08:30 PM EDT
             I will accept your please :) -NT - (boxley) - April 23, 2002, 05:36:19 PM EDT
         Important to be - ' inflammable', to all tents and porpoises -NT - (Ashton) - (1) - April 23, 2002, 05:47:52 PM EDT
             Reminds me of an article I read ina car magazine long ago - (Meerkat) - April 23, 2002, 06:49:10 PM EDT
         The point is is that... -NT - (Another Scott) - April 23, 2002, 06:00:38 PM EDT
         "Proctor and Gamble" (T'was on the _Reg_[*] yesterday) - (CRConrad) - (1) - April 23, 2002, 06:24:47 PM EDT
             Re: "Proctor and Gamble" (T'was on the _Reg_[*] yesterday) - (folkert) - April 26, 2002, 08:42:38 PM EDT
         It's over hear (sic) - (static) - (4) - April 23, 2002, 10:52:11 PM EDT
             Aye - extends to could of, would of, might of... - (Meerkat) - (1) - April 23, 2002, 11:10:06 PM EDT
                 Add Meerkat to pot... - (static) - April 23, 2002, 11:31:12 PM EDT
             Re: It's over hear (sic) - (Gibbo) - April 24, 2002, 05:15:26 AM EDT
             If that were true, the contraction would be 'should'f'... -NT - (jb4) - April 24, 2002, 09:50:06 AM EDT
         Your just not gettin' it. -NT - (jbrabeck) - April 24, 2002, 08:42:31 AM EDT