IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Politics Forum / Ralph in 2008 was harmless, so good for you
Post #362,505
by rcareaga
Picture of rcareaga
9/12/12 2:09:17 PM
Reply
New Ralph in 2008 was harmless, so good for you
And frankly, mmoffitt, I take the strongest exception to your characterization of my logic as "tortured." Even were my thought processes faulty in this instance—which I do not for a moment concede—the proper term would be "enhanced logic." Do have a care.

cordially,
Post #362,510
by mmoffitt
9/12/12 4:32:03 PM
Reply
New Noted. But, ...
in this instance I was referring to Scott Lemieux's brand of logic being tortured. No offense intended toward yours.
     Yeah, the two parties are the same. Give up. Let it burn. - (Another Scott) - (29) - Sept. 7, 2012, 09:53:31 PM EDT
         Yes, they are - (SpiceWare) - (28) - Sept. 8, 2012, 01:01:03 PM EDT
             Point of order. - (Another Scott) - (27) - Sept. 8, 2012, 01:31:57 PM EDT
                 the issue for me - (SpiceWare) - (3) - Sept. 8, 2012, 01:54:43 PM EDT
                     Things can change for the better. - (Another Scott) - (2) - Sept. 8, 2012, 02:26:49 PM EDT
                         it would change faster - (SpiceWare) - (1) - Sept. 8, 2012, 02:40:20 PM EDT
                             Please see my reply below. -NT - (Another Scott) - Sept. 8, 2012, 02:53:51 PM EDT
                 Re: Point of order. - (hnick) - (22) - Sept. 8, 2012, 02:26:36 PM EDT
                     Man - please lighten up a little. :-) - (Another Scott) - (4) - Sept. 8, 2012, 02:53:24 PM EDT
                         yeah, they'll really listen - (SpiceWare) - (3) - Sept. 8, 2012, 04:17:05 PM EDT
                             It was an important call. - (Another Scott) - (2) - Sept. 8, 2012, 04:51:53 PM EDT
                                 it was Sheila being Sheila - (SpiceWare) - (1) - Sept. 8, 2012, 06:52:00 PM EDT
                                     Meh. 14 years ago.... :-) - (Another Scott) - Sept. 8, 2012, 07:06:52 PM EDT
                     turning your stomach - (rcareaga) - (16) - Sept. 8, 2012, 07:48:35 PM EDT
                         <blush> You're far more eloquent than me. Thanks. -NT - (Another Scott) - (4) - Sept. 8, 2012, 09:05:42 PM EDT
                             I'm eloquent. You're cogent. There's a difference. -NT - (rcareaga) - (3) - Sept. 8, 2012, 11:16:27 PM EDT
                                 Who's Curly then? -NT - (malraux) - (2) - Sept. 8, 2012, 11:20:19 PM EDT
                                     Every man for himself! -NT - (Another Scott) - Sept. 8, 2012, 11:23:45 PM EDT
                                     Hey Moe! Poink. -NT - (crazy) - Sept. 9, 2012, 07:00:47 AM EDT
                         Re: turning your stomach - (hnick) - (2) - Sept. 9, 2012, 07:49:05 AM EDT
                             Don't. Lets reason together and get closer to the truth. -NT - (Another Scott) - Sept. 9, 2012, 08:40:02 AM EDT
                             'course I don't want you to shut up. - (rcareaga) - Sept. 9, 2012, 09:41:11 PM EDT
                         Um, "not second-guess your ethical stance"? - (mmoffitt) - (7) - Sept. 10, 2012, 10:15:23 AM EDT
                             I was talking about *his* ethical stance - (rcareaga) - (6) - Sept. 10, 2012, 01:26:23 PM EDT
                                 :0) -NT - (mmoffitt) - (5) - Sept. 10, 2012, 02:38:36 PM EDT
                                     further to nader - (rcareaga) - (4) - Sept. 12, 2012, 12:36:52 AM EDT
                                         He makes a very strong case. Thanks. -NT - (Another Scott) - Sept. 12, 2012, 08:33:20 AM EDT
                                         I thought it was a load of crap. - (mmoffitt) - (2) - Sept. 12, 2012, 10:29:42 AM EDT
                                             Ralph in 2008 was harmless, so good for you - (rcareaga) - (1) - Sept. 12, 2012, 02:09:17 PM EDT
                                                 Noted. But, ... - (mmoffitt) - Sept. 12, 2012, 04:32:03 PM EDT

This movie doesn't scrape the bottom of the barrel. This movie isn't the bottom of the barrel. This movie isn't below the bottom of the barrel. This movie doesn't deserve to be mentioned in the same sentence with barrels.
86 ms