Post #361,757
8/16/12 9:26:02 AM
|
RIM is still the only semi-secure solution.
|
Post #361,760
8/16/12 9:41:28 AM
|
Not so.
iPhone does full-device encryption too, with remote lock/wipe. Dunno about Android, but I bet it does or will Real Soon Now.
True, you can set a BB to wipe itself if it doesn't contact the mothership after a certain time, but the proportion of the market that would actually genuinely miss that feature is, I posit, tiny.
|
Post #361,763
8/16/12 10:29:15 AM
|
And you can only "remotely wipe" an iPhone if...
it connects to you. If a handheld has been compromised, I don't want it connecting to me. But that's not the only trouble with iPhones.
See here for example:
http://www.sit.fraun...st-passwords.html
What "proportion of the market would actually genuinely miss" the additional security is irrelevant. This is the age of Facebook. An age when the great mass of marching morons cannot be trusted to make security decisions - even when it comes to securing their own information.
|
Post #361,770
8/16/12 1:25:47 PM
|
Shrug
You said RIM phones are the only semi-secure option.
They're not.
They're arguably the most secure, but there're other secure enough options.
Are you seriously contending that people need timed remote wipe on non-connection to a remote server?
That's a nice tinfoil hat you've got, there.
|
Post #361,771
8/16/12 2:11:56 PM
|
They clearly don't need it for personal use.
But for some businesses (my current employer included) it is a must.
Of course, you Brits have no trouble with being snooped upon incessantly so I'm not surprised you think anyone concerned with privacy is worthy of a tinfoil hat.
|
Post #361,773
8/16/12 2:30:42 PM
|
Heh, and you're not snooped on *at all*, right?
You keep right on believing that.
And constructing strawmen, while you're at it.
I know there are some businesses that want remote timed wipe; it's just that there are almost certainly too few of them to sustain RIM.
Feel free to continue arguing with things I didn't say, though.
|
Post #361,774
8/16/12 3:07:31 PM
|
Of course we're snooped on. I've read the USA PATRIOT Act.
It's just that *we* don't like it. Most of you Brits think its not a problem. The Queen's entitled and all that. That's among the reasons we broke away from you, remember? ;0)
|
Post #361,775
8/16/12 4:05:23 PM
|
Says who?
You're just making things up now.
|
Post #361,776
8/16/12 4:31:53 PM
|
Yes, but he has a REALLY REALLY...
Nice big stack of straw back there.
And He is making the biggest burning man strawman you've ever seen!
|
Post #361,787
8/16/12 11:53:20 PM
|
Android does, too.
I haven't installed it but I know someone who did. It's slightly scary to setup, actually because the ability to remotely reset the device is fairly prominently displayed. And then partway through the install it looks like it's done a factory reset - only it hasn't really, it's just waiting for you login.
Wade.
|
Post #361,796
8/17/12 8:25:29 AM
8/17/12 8:26:24 AM
|
Yep.
That's why I said RIM is still the only semi-secure solution. My yanking Peter's chain aside, he is right. Almost nobody cares. The bank my company uses for the health savings accounts recently rolled out iPhones to their people. They manage them through Airwatch which requires an agent on the device - a lot like MobileIron. The bank doesn't even disable Siri or iCloud *and* they allow their users to add 3rd party email accounts to their devices. But their IT Security guy said, "That's not a problem, though, because we don't show them how to add 3rd party email accounts." I damned near fell off my chair.
edit: tpyo
Edited by mmoffitt
Aug. 17, 2012, 08:26:24 AM EDT
|
Post #361,809
8/17/12 1:34:23 PM
|
Wouldn't you think banks would hire people who know that?
You'd be wrong. Because that comes lower on the "shit we care about" scale than not going bankrupt, and they haven't been real good at that lately.
--
Drew
|