On the other hand . . .

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #361,207 by Andrew Grygus 7/23/12 2:41:18 PM Reply	On the other hand . . . . . totalitarian governments don't much fear private vehicles - they are easily knocked out with guns. Even a .22 caliber revolver can easily knock out a car with one shot through the radiator.
Post #361,208 by drook 7/23/12 2:51:29 PM Reply	Another difference Cars only continue to be useful as long as you have a source of gas. Guns can be useful just waving them around. -- Drew
Post #361,210 by mmoffitt 7/23/12 3:06:49 PM Reply	Yabut what's an unloaded firearm? A hammer.
Post #361,214 by drook 7/23/12 4:06:28 PM Reply	Close An unloaded firearm is a hammer if the person you're pointing at knows it's unloaded. But I wasn't talking just about an unloaded firearm. If you've got a gun with one bullet, you can hold people at bay until they get desperate enough. A machine gun with a full clip, and even desperation won't do it for most people. Point is, when a totalitarian regime is exerting control, cars are easy. Just cut off the fuel deliveries. Taking away guns is a door-to-door affair, and they're small and easy to hide. -- Drew

Assault deaths in the USA. - (Another Scott) - (23) - July 23, 2012, 11:50:45 AM EDT

I'm getting tired of this. - (mmoffitt) - (1) - July 23, 2012, 12:10:26 PM EDT

Sure it is - (crazy) - July 23, 2012, 01:39:19 PM EDT

"Gun laws and the slippery slope" - (rcareaga) - (17) - July 23, 2012, 02:27:52 PM EDT

Non comparable - (crazy) - July 23, 2012, 02:41:05 PM EDT

On the other hand . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (3) - July 23, 2012, 02:41:18 PM EDT

Another difference - (drook) - (2) - July 23, 2012, 02:51:29 PM EDT

Yabut what's an unloaded firearm? - (mmoffitt) - (1) - July 23, 2012, 03:06:49 PM EDT

Close - (drook) - July 23, 2012, 04:06:28 PM EDT

I think there's something we should watch a lot closer. - (mmoffitt) - (11) - July 23, 2012, 03:06:28 PM EDT

Okay... - (folkert) - (1) - July 23, 2012, 03:27:41 PM EDT

Re: Okay... - (Ashton) - July 23, 2012, 11:02:12 PM EDT

So now protective fabric should be illegal? - (crazy) - (8) - July 23, 2012, 03:39:03 PM EDT

Umm ... - (drook) - (7) - July 23, 2012, 04:10:25 PM EDT

Can anyone above give me a rational use for body armor? - (mmoffitt) - (6) - July 24, 2012, 10:38:29 AM EDT

Blasting technicians at mines? (Yeah, it's a stretch.) -NT - (Another Scott) - July 24, 2012, 10:56:39 AM EDT

I ALREADY gave one - (crazy) - July 24, 2012, 12:16:52 PM EDT

Ever heard of Hough? - (drook) - (2) - July 24, 2012, 10:08:02 PM EDT

Hough? - (hnick) - (1) - July 25, 2012, 07:19:22 AM EDT

Benton Harbor, MI? - (folkert) - July 25, 2012, 08:49:09 AM EDT

Well, you still want to prohibit it? - (crazy) - July 25, 2012, 03:48:09 PM EDT

Well, now we know what Mitt thinks - (malraux) - July 23, 2012, 03:54:05 PM EDT

Now if you live in/visit Chicago.. - (Ashton) - (1) - July 23, 2012, 08:16:49 PM EDT

Thankfully, the Loop is clear. - (mvitale) - July 23, 2012, 08:54:33 PM EDT

Powered by tiki torches of mass battery operation!
132 ms