IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Backstory on how the decision was released and reported.
http://www.scotusblo...ring-assessments/

We’re getting wildly differing assessments

The announcement of the Supreme Court’s decision largely upholding the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act on Thursday, June 28 precipitated a genuine media drama. Millions tuned in to get the result in real time, and were rewarded with the spectacle of two major news networks reporting the story incorrectly. Indeed, the President himself was in limbo while his staff raced to find out whether the Court had struck down his signature policy initiative.

I have taken a deep dive into those events; my first effort at real journalism. The following is the story of what happened at the Supreme Court, SCOTUSblog, CNN, Fox News, and the White House that day between 10:06 (when the Court released the opinion) and 10:15 (when CNN reversed itself and reported that the mandate had been upheld). Everything is based on interviews with those directly involved; nothing is second hand.

[...]

The Court’s own technical staff prepares to load the opinion on to the Court’s website. In years past, the Court would have emailed copies of the decision to the Solicitor General and the parties’ lawyers once it was announced. But now it relies only on its website, where opinions are released approximately two minutes later. The week before, the Court declined our request that it distribute this opinion to the press by email; it has complete faith in the exceptional effort it has made to ensure that the website will not fail.

But it does. At this moment, the website is the subject of perhaps greater demand than any other site on the Internet – ever. It is the one and only place where anyone in the country not at the building – including not just the public, but press editors and the White House – can get the ruling. And millions of people are now on the site anxiously looking for the decision. They multiply the burden of their individual visits many times over – hitting refresh again, and again, and again. In the face of the crushing demand, the Court cannot publish its own decision.

The opinion will not appear on the website for a half-hour. So everyone in the country not personally at 1 First St., NE in Washington, DC is completely dependent on the press to get the decision right.

[...]


An interesting read.

(via Brad DeLong)

Cheers,
Scott.
New I hereby bring suit against the SCOTUS for
A premeditated self-inflicted DDOS attack, with the aim of flummoxing gazillions of people--via the utterly contradictory first-two pages!

I seek the heads of the Red-Five-bloc:
on the silver plate with John/teh/Baptist's now somewhat time-worn.. remains.

It's only Fair..
     SCOTUSBlog - Live blogging of the decision today. - (Another Scott) - (28)
         Mandate is constitutional. It's a tax. -NT - (Another Scott) - (2)
             of course it is a tax - (boxley) - (1)
                 Re: of course it is a tax - (Another Scott)
         Bottom line: - (Another Scott)
         It's a Glorious Day For Fascism! -NT - (mmoffitt) - (5)
             you meant "Socialism" </sarcasm> -NT - (lincoln) - (4)
                 no, facism is correct - (boxley) - (3)
                     how much did Big Pharma pay - (lincoln) - (2)
                         60 million, inflation ya know -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                             Never - (hnick)
         The 193 page opinion. - (Another Scott) - (9)
             I've not read many of these, but, ... - (mmoffitt) - (8)
                 It's not unusual. - (Another Scott)
                 gotta remember - (boxley)
                 Maybe Ginsberg saved the ACA by convincing Roberts. - (Another Scott) - (5)
                     she also thinks that selling marijuana 200 ft from a school - (boxley) - (4)
                         Eh? - (Another Scott) - (2)
                             not that one, let me check later -NT - (boxley)
                             I'm not sure if this is what he's talking about - (hnick)
                         While we're talking about other USSC cases... - (Another Scott)
         And in today's rendition of "Unclear On The Concept" - (malraux) - (2)
             ROFL! -NT - (boxley)
             </me falls over> -NT - (mmoffitt)
         Sullivan's has some interesting things in it - (malraux) - (1)
             Counterpoint. - (Another Scott)
         Romney: individual mandate is ultimate conservatism - (malraux)
         Backstory on how the decision was released and reported. - (Another Scott) - (1)
             I hereby bring suit against the SCOTUS for - (Ashton)

Did you like my little stink wafties?
100 ms