WeÂre getting wildly differing assessments
The announcement of the Supreme CourtÂs decision largely upholding the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act on Thursday, June 28 precipitated a genuine media drama. Millions tuned in to get the result in real time, and were rewarded with the spectacle of two major news networks reporting the story incorrectly. Indeed, the President himself was in limbo while his staff raced to find out whether the Court had struck down his signature policy initiative.
I have taken a deep dive into those events; my first effort at real journalism. The following is the story of what happened at the Supreme Court, SCOTUSblog, CNN, Fox News, and the White House that day between 10:06 (when the Court released the opinion) and 10:15 (when CNN reversed itself and reported that the mandate had been upheld). Everything is based on interviews with those directly involved; nothing is second hand.
[...]
The CourtÂs own technical staff prepares to load the opinion on to the CourtÂs website. In years past, the Court would have emailed copies of the decision to the Solicitor General and the parties lawyers once it was announced. But now it relies only on its website, where opinions are released approximately two minutes later. The week before, the Court declined our request that it distribute this opinion to the press by email; it has complete faith in the exceptional effort it has made to ensure that the website will not fail.
But it does. At this moment, the website is the subject of perhaps greater demand than any other site on the Internet  ever. It is the one and only place where anyone in the country not at the building  including not just the public, but press editors and the White House  can get the ruling. And millions of people are now on the site anxiously looking for the decision. They multiply the burden of their individual visits many times over  hitting refresh again, and again, and again. In the face of the crushing demand, the Court cannot publish its own decision.
The opinion will not appear on the website for a half-hour. So everyone in the country not personally at 1 First St., NE in Washington, DC is completely dependent on the press to get the decision right.
[...]
An interesting read.
(via Brad DeLong)
Cheers,
Scott.