Re: What are the better ones?

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #359,390 by Andrew Grygus 6/22/12 12:13:18 PM Reply	Re: What are the better ones? Yes, AVG is still widely respected, though it's gotten awfully complex lately. I see a lot of comment on Avast, but I haven't tried it. I recently talked to a guy who works at a shop that does a lot of infection clean-up. He asked me what I install. I told him mostly AVG and Malwarebytes. He said he was relieved I didn't mention any of the "top three".
Post #359,392 by hnick 6/22/12 1:07:35 PM Reply	Thanks. I've been using AVG It was once considered one of the best among the people I knew. I didn't know if it had gone downhill or not. So many products do.

Mother of all boot kits. - (Andrew Grygus) - (18) - June 21, 2012, 11:38:01 PM EDT

Winders == Perpetual job security for AG, eh? Good luck. -NT - (Another Scott) - June 22, 2012, 06:58:11 AM EDT

I'd have written the disk off as fecked and replaced it, tbh - (pwhysall) - (2) - June 22, 2012, 08:05:07 AM EDT

No way to know THAT would have fixed it without the actual - (crazy) - June 22, 2012, 08:30:10 AM EDT

That could be dangerous. - (static) - June 23, 2012, 04:07:41 AM EDT

Also... - (pwhysall) - (11) - June 22, 2012, 08:39:01 AM EDT

WTF? - (crazy) - (5) - June 22, 2012, 09:06:51 AM EDT

See? - (folkert) - June 22, 2012, 09:38:51 AM EDT

Shrug - (pwhysall) - (2) - June 22, 2012, 09:59:04 AM EDT

nods, yup -NT - (boxley) - June 22, 2012, 10:02:06 AM EDT

Wot 'e said. -NT - (mmoffitt) - June 22, 2012, 01:14:05 PM EDT

Shrug - (pwhysall) - June 22, 2012, 10:12:39 AM EDT

They never know . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (4) - June 22, 2012, 11:26:25 AM EDT

What are the better ones? - (hnick) - (3) - June 22, 2012, 11:49:52 AM EDT

Re: What are the better ones? - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - June 22, 2012, 12:13:18 PM EDT

Thanks. I've been using AVG - (hnick) - June 22, 2012, 01:07:35 PM EDT

Jumped the shark at v8 - (scoenye) - June 22, 2012, 05:58:17 PM EDT

So then.. - (Ashton) - (1) - June 24, 2012, 06:21:50 PM EDT

The fact that . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - June 24, 2012, 08:36:08 PM EDT

IBM is good at two things:

40 ms