So, "reporters" == "bombers" to you? Fascinating.
That's what I hear you saying.
Really? When I say that Israel should NOT keep reporters and Red Cross workers off of the battlefield, you read that as letting bombers in?
So, in your mind, "reporters" == "bombers"?
Bombers were coming in. Israel went out and is trying to smack them off at the root. Rather than trying to whack the terrorists before they get the chance to strap some explosives to themselves, you want them to just sit back and just react to the next suicide bus-bombing.
Fascinating. Allow me to quote from my previous post.
I said:
To me, not *trying* to slaughter civilians means nothing.
Like I've said before, "victims" or "collateral damage" or whatever. Dead women and children is dead women and children.
And, >IF< reporters had been allowed in, the "evidence" would be clearer.
Again, I say that Israel should NOT keep reporters off of the battlefield.
And you read that as me saying Israel should allow suicide bombers in.
Fascinating.