IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Ah, so Israel should just lay back and let bombers in.
That's what I hear you saying. Bombers were coming in. Israel went out and is trying to smack them off at the root. Rather than trying to whack the terrorists before they get the chance to strap some explosives to themselves, you want them to just sit back and just react to the next suicide bus-bombing.

Yah. Works real well with me.
Famous last RPG quotes: "I'll just shoot this fireball down the dungeon passageway..."
New So, "reporters" == "bombers" to you? Fascinating.
That's what I hear you saying.
Really? When I say that Israel should NOT keep reporters and Red Cross workers off of the battlefield, you read that as letting bombers in?

So, in your mind, "reporters" == "bombers"?

Bombers were coming in. Israel went out and is trying to smack them off at the root. Rather than trying to whack the terrorists before they get the chance to strap some explosives to themselves, you want them to just sit back and just react to the next suicide bus-bombing.
Fascinating. Allow me to quote from my previous post.

I said:
To me, not *trying* to slaughter civilians means nothing.

Like I've said before, "victims" or "collateral damage" or whatever. Dead women and children is dead women and children.

And, >IF< reporters had been allowed in, the "evidence" would be clearer.
Again, I say that Israel should NOT keep reporters off of the battlefield.

And you read that as me saying Israel should allow suicide bombers in.

Fascinating.
New So Reporters==evidence?
If that is the case, Clinton should be hung, Bush did win the election OJ is guilty and all Palestinians are angels with just a couple of bad eggs that arafat cant control.:)
TAM ARIS QUAM ARMIPOTENS
New Reporters == evidence.
If reporters were there during Clinton's "crimes", the case would be a lot easier. (it's "hanged" not "hung").

We have LOTS of evidence about how the election was handled. We also have lots of spin. But the evidence is recorded.

If reporters had been present during the killing, OJ's trial would have gone a lot quicker.

If Israel had allowed reporters on the battlefield, the world could SEE how the operations were handled and SEE who the dead were and how many. Otherwise, it is all forensics and spin. If I were Palestinian, I'd be moving ANY dead women and children I could to those sites. Eventually, someone will start digging through the rubble. The more bodies they find then, the worse Israel will look. And it doesn't take a lot of dead children to affect world opinion.
New flesh not rope :)
TAM ARIS QUAM ARMIPOTENS
New TMI
Too
Much
Information

ewwwwwwwwww
     Please, tell me this isn't true. - (pwhysall) - (39)
         I've never been in the army... - (Arkadiy)
         Its true - (boxley) - (19)
             Left? - (pwhysall) - (1)
                 Same place people in london went during the blitz - (boxley)
             But why lie about it then? - (Brandioch) - (13)
                 You can't let the Red Cross into a combat zone - (rsf) - (12)
                     Only once. - (Brandioch) - (11)
                         I'll spell it out for you - (rsf) - (10)
                             Try spelling it out again. - (Brandioch) - (9)
                                 I can't comment beyond this post - (rsf)
                                 Intention does matter - (3)) - (7)
                                     Yep. - (Brandioch) - (6)
                                         Actually, he's got a point. - (inthane-chan) - (5)
                                             Drones aren't the technology we need... - (hnick) - (4)
                                                 Exactly! 'Fair Witness' is dead-on. But WHO amongst us ??? -NT - (Ashton) - (3)
                                                     Ah, but drones are just the start... - (inthane-chan)
                                                     Doesn't matter... wouldn't work - (hnick) - (1)
                                                         An important minority* would value them, but - (Ashton)
             Heh. - (mmoffitt) - (2)
                 At this point in time..... - (Brandioch)
                 My guess? Not many, maybe none. - (3))
         It isn't - (3)) - (5)
             Yep, they sure did. - (SpiceWare) - (2)
                 Interesting article. - (Brandioch) - (1)
                     It is on the Editorial/Opinions page -NT - (SpiceWare)
             Re. 'lying' - (Ashton) - (1)
                 There is ONE way to "know". - (Brandioch)
         It is not - (bluke) - (11)
             Fascinating. - (Brandioch) - (10)
                 There you go again - (wharris2) - (7)
                     I'm just reading the articles. - (Brandioch) - (6)
                         Ah, so Israel should just lay back and let bombers in. - (wharris2) - (5)
                             So, "reporters" == "bombers" to you? Fascinating. - (Brandioch) - (4)
                                 So Reporters==evidence? - (boxley) - (3)
                                     Reporters == evidence. - (Brandioch) - (2)
                                         flesh not rope :) -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                                             TMI - (Brandioch)
                 That is the word. - (static) - (1)
                     It's a nasty bit of business, killing. - (Brandioch)

Obeying the Law of Unintended Consequences since 2001.
153 ms